University of Notre Dame
Archives   


Calendar: 1862

(1862 Feb)

Atkinson, W(illiam)

To (Orestes A. Brownson)
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

(Fragment of letter only)

(Atkinson) has questioned Catholics and they seem to differ from (Brownson). This will be sufficient excuse for troubling (Brownson). Signed a Reader, W(illia)m Atkinson.

I-4-b A.L.S. 1p. 12mo.
1


(1862 Feb.)

(Brownson, Orestes)
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

To (William Atkinson)

The statement contained in the printed article and objected to by reader is an exaggerated expression of a sound truth. In its terms, it is not defensible and may be without violence to the obvious sense of language, wrenched to a meaning which is at the same time offensive and untrue. "A Catholic can have no right incompatible with Christian humility," is what should have been written. The answer to "Reader," which is submitted is at least harmless, saving the mention of the fact that Archbishop Francis Patrick Kenrick solicited the original approbation given by the other prelates to the Review. That declaration might give offense and has no bearing upon the point at issue. It should undoubtedly be supposed as proving nothing on either side. Enclosed is a newspaper clipping in which a reader criticizes Brownson's articles on Catholic Schools, saying that Brownson must be pleased by the Protestant's acceptance of his structures on Catholic education.

I-4-b 2pp. 12mo.
1


1862 Feb 1

Koopman, Father Ch(arles) P.
Paris, K(untuck)y

to Bishop P(eter) P(aul) Lefev(e)re
(Detroit, Michigan)

Koopmans is informed of a more or less disagreeable correspondence between Lefevere and Bishop (George Aloysius) Carrell in reference to Koopmans' coming to Detroit. He expresses sorrow for being the occasion of trouble to Lefevere, especially after Koopmans' short but agreeable stay in Lefevere's diocese. He thanks Lefevere for his many services and his too favorable opinion of him.

III-2-j A.L.S. 1pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 2

Sumner, Charles
Washington, (D.C.)

To (Orestes A. Brownson)
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

Brownson's son's nomination will be confirmed in the Senate. The new Secretary of War is now with them. Sumner knows him well; he will inspire victory. President (Abraham) Lincoln discussed a proposition with Chase and Sumner "of greater magnitude than was ever yet submitted yet submitted to deliberative assembly." Sumner told Lincoln he believed the convicted slave trader should be hanged to deter other slave-traders, to give notice to the world of a changed policy and to show that the government can save a man, although Sumner does not believe in capital punishment.

I-4-b A.L.S. 4pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 3

Hendricken, Father Thomas F.
Waterbury, Conn(ecticut)

To Bishop F(rancis) P. McFarland
(of Hartford Providence, Rhode Island)

For the lot in Litchfield they are offered another far more eligible and $125 besides. A poor German wishes to make an exchange because of a dilapidated, untenable house on their lot. Mr. Beers and all friends there urge them to obtain the permission for this contract. He sends the deed for the Bishop's signature if he approves, also a quit claim deed that Beers originally had on their property. If the Bishop signs there must be three witnesses in the presence of the justice.

I-1-b A.L.S. 1p. 8vo.
2


(18)62 Feb 3

Jamey, Father V(ictor)
(Convent, Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin) should beg Father (Napoleon Joseph) Perché not to speak about the abominable question of slavery any more. With his anti-canonical title of the official newspaper of the diocese, he could completely paralyze (Odin's) trip to France putting him in a bad light and perhaps making him badly received. Twenty times he has repeated this unintelligible nonsense: We conservatives do not recognize in man any other spiritual right than that of attaining the spiritual end by knowing, loving and serving God. That only signifies that the Poles, the Irish, the Neapolitans and other Italians neither can nor should throw off the yoke of oppression because they can attain their end. He wonders where the means are for the Negroes to attain their end. Perché defends Bishop (Augustine) Verot's discourse, but who cannot see that the second part of it peremptorily refutes the first because the author certainly has no hope of seeing put into practice, in this country, the conditions which he poses for the legitimacy of slavery. Perché repeats to satiety that the Christian religion does not condemn slavery directly no, but indirectly yes. Prudence requires that one should not speak against these institutions and the Church gives an example of this silence, but for one to defend them is not Christian. On his first trip to the city he will give (Odin) a more complete and solid critique of Verot's sermon. The Propagateur (Catholique) is much too belligerent and much too concerned with their institutions. He asks (Odin) to burn this page after he has read it. It is obvious, and consequently useless, to prove that the abolitionists of the North have in view a double crime, the extermination of the whites and blacks of the South. On his last trip to the city, (Father Anthony?) Jourdan, (S.J.) made him promise to spend two months with him. As he hopes that the blockade will be raised by April, he asks (Odin) to send his replacement by the end of (February). Father (Eleazar) Vignonet is very angry with him Vignonet has not addressed any complaints to him, but he has not seen him since three days after the retreat. He told Jamey, in the presence of certain individuals, that he would do all that he could to oblige him to leave. Since then, a number of anonymous notes, written in pencil and of a very bad taste, have been found in the house and around it. It is a scandal that Jamey deplores for Vignonet and for (St. Michael's). He makes himself more and more impossible at the Convent (of the Religious of the Sacred Heart) and unpopular in his parish. If it were possible for (Odin) to stop (at Convent) while going to Baton Rouge, he would fill everyone with joy.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 4to.
9


1862 Feb 4

Delacroix, Father C(yril)
St. Gabriel, (Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

After receiving the letter from the brother, Delacroix wrote to Mrs. Duval of Covington not to have any changes made in the house and to leave it. She had the privilege of purchasing it during the year's lease, but far from taking advantage of it, she did not even pay the rent. He has not made any deed of sale with her nor has he authorized anyone to do so. He thinks his letter will suffice. However, if (Odin) believes it to be necessary for him to make the trip, he will do so on Monday.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 1p. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 4

Fitzgerald, (Father) Edward
Columbus, (Ohio)

To (Archbishop John Baptist Purcell)
(Cincinnati, Ohio)

Fitzgerald would have liked to see Purcell in Cincinnati, but he is unable to leave Columbus because of the stroke of partial paralysis suffered by Father (Thomas J.) Coppinger. He is quite certain the false charges written against him were written by one of the school brothers. Fitzgerald's contracts to fence the property of Mr. Phelan were broken by the man engaged to do the work. The only relatives living with him are his sister who does the housework and his Father who acts as sexton. Edward O'Mealey never stopped ten minutes over six times since he left for Ireland 15 years ago. The Chalice was stolen and so Fitzgerald bought a safe but few people know of this, except the mentioned school teacher who knows why it was bought. The church income is $1800 per annum and after expenses are met there remains but $650 for Pastor, current expenses and payment on the debt left by Father (James) Meagher. Though the debt was $2317, it is almost all paid off because of Fitzgerald's accomplishments. He says that he will always be ready for any work Purcell may demand of him.

II-5-b A.L.S. 4pp. 12mo.
4


(18)62 Feb 5

Lynch, P(atrick) N., Bishop of
Charleston, S(outh) C(arolina)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin's) letter of January 18 and that of A. Damanic (?) with the extremely liberal contribution were received and Lynch handed it over to the Treasurer of the General Committee on Relief of which he is a member. The Committee voted $1000 to the Sisters (of Our Lady of Mercy) to replace the furniture, etc. that the orphans had lost, having previously let them have provisions, etc. to the amount of $500. It is impossible to estimate the amount of loss incurred by the fire. He is leaving in an hour for Richmond. As soon as peace will allow, he will come to collect for their cathedral. A Father J. McDonough made his appearance a few days ago and has gone to Norfolk to go to a Franciscan monastery as a house of refuge.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 2pp. 8vo.
5


1862 Feb 5

Young, O.P., Father N(icholas) D.
St. Catherine's Cottage, Kentucky

to Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell)
of (Cincinnati, Ohio)

Young has received (Purcell's) letter with its sad information. He has reason to fear that it is true. The scandals in Memphis he had heard from Father (James M.) Clarkson and at the suggestion of Bishop (Martin J.) Spalding he wrote to Bishop (James) Whelan. The admonition was never noticed. He has feared a repetition. They heard that Whelan had left Louisville but was not coming to their convent. If Spalding has heard from (Purcell) Young hopes that he persuaded Whelan to come to them where he can save himself from degradation of character by retirement with or among the community at St. Rose.

II-5-b A.L.S. 2pp. 16to.
5


1862 Feb 5

Whelan, O.P., James, Bishop of Nashville
Louisville, Kentucky

to Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell)
of Cincinnati, Ohio

Whelan is pained to write on the subject. He admits using some stimulant because of the coldness during his trip to Louisville, as he has on other occasions. He denies that he has any propensity of this kind. He does not wish to excuse his folly but asks that the matter be dropped or left before the throne of God. He solemnly promises not to use such stimulants again unless under physicians orders. If Purcell writes he is to address the letter in care of Bishop (Martin) J. Spalding.

II-5-b A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
1


1862 Feb 6

(Elder), William Henry, Bishop of
Natchez, (Mississippi)

To Archbishop J(ohn) M(ary) Odin, (C.M.)
N(ew) Orleans, (Louisiana)

With regard to the serious case of conscience about which he consulted Odin, on close consideration of the facts and of the person's defense, together with a consultation of all the authorities (Elder) could find, he concluded that the case was not nearly so grievous as it had first appeared. He had no reason to believe the person intended to commit the offense. The inquiry produced a deep impression and as he could not see any penalty for imprudence that was practicable and would not cause injury to religion, he concluded, with the assent of the consulters, that the person should simply make a good and closed retreat and resume his duties. However, he told him he would consult Odin and, if he thought that the interests of religion required anything more, he would act accordingly. With regard to drink he is persuaded there is no habit. He has sufficient evidence of no real intoxication. The person makes his retreat with the Redemptorists with a promise to go direct from the house to the boat. It will be some self-denial for one who has never been in N(ew) Orleans before. Elder received from (Pope Pius IX) a reply to the letter he sent with their contribution. It was forwarded by Dr. (Jeremiah) Cummings through Fortress Monroe. Their soldiers, who were called for sixty days, have r5eturned. Four have died out of the hundred and some are still sick.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 3pp. 4to.
4


1862 Feb 6

Fitzgerald, (Father) Joseph
Delaware, (Ohio)

To Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell)
(Cincinnati, Ohio)

Fitzgerald encloses a full statement of the financial affairs of the Church. The school is not self sufficing and the collections are small. The two men who complained to Purcell about the downfall of the school are in debt to it themselves, as can be seen on Mr. Miller's Jr. books. Neither of them should consider themselves Catholics because they haven't attended Mass for 6 months. The Irish were about to have the teacher dismissed but Fitzgerald spoiled their plans. The elder Mr. Miller is responsible for adding $200 to the church debt by buying a small organ. Miller is a very moody and eccentric old man, and he was wrong when he told Purcell that Fitzgerald was neglecting his German countrymen because he promised them and kept his promise at a cost of $48 to himself by having a German priest in six times a year. The Germans are zealous and have often asked that he denounce the few complainers. He has complied with Purcell's wish that he visit none but his own people and went so far as to decline an invitation to Judge Williams. Because he lives half a mile from the Chapel he says Mass but 2 or 3 times a week.

II-5-b A.L.S. 8pp. 12mo.
1


1862 Feb 6

Kelley, W(illia)m D.
Washington, (D.C.)

To (Orestes A. Brownson
Elizabeth, New Jersey)

Kelley with Brownson's consent would permit the writer of the accompanying note to print the portion of Brownson's letter that refers to (Martin Franklin) Conway's speech but not the whole letter at the present time. He asks Brownson to answer by return mail.

A.L.S. 1p. 12mo.

Enclosure:

--------
1862 Feb 5

Barker, E.D.
N(ew) Y(ork, New York)

To William D. Kelley
(Washington, D.C.)

Next week Barker will publish the speech M.F. Conway delivered in the House of Representatives on December twelfth. It will be the twenty-eighth of the "Pulpit and Rostrum." He has read Brownson's letter to Kelley concerning the speech and would like permission to publish a part or the whole of it, probably only those parts which refer directly to the merits of the speech. This would be used for advertising purposes. If Kelley approves, Barker may publish the entire letter in a daily or weekly journal.

I-4-b A.L.S. 1p. 8vo.
4


1862 Feb 6

Kindekens, Father P(eter)
Adrian, (Michigan)

To Bishop P(eter) P(aul) Lefevere
(Detroit, Michigan)

Kindekens encloses a letter from his brother (Joseph Kindekens) for Lefevere's perusal. He informs the bishop of a letter from Mr. Smalley of Swanton, Vermont about the Highgate case. It is a very complicated affair; having been in the County Courts and the Supreme Court, it is now being tried in Chancery. He thinks he will have to go to Yankeedom to make this last trial succeed. There are so many nice points of Canon Law, which he could not well explain in writing without writing a volume; an examination before a Commission here or in Detroit would not afford a proper exposition. In case he should be asked to go to Vermont could Lefevere send somebody to care for his parish during his absence?

III-2-j A.L.S. 1p. 8vo.
2


1862 Feb 6

Murphy, M.M.J.
San Patricio, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Murphy's slight acquaintance with (Odin) has induced her to request him to let her know what she could buy a young Negress for, with or without one or two children, or a Negress and Negro, as she is told that they are cheap in New Orleans. She would then send him the money for one or both with directions, etc., and request him to use his own judgment in purchasing the same. Mr. Murphy is not home or he would join her in wishing him their kindest wishes.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 3pp. 16mo.
2


1862 Feb 7

Campaux, Theo(dore) J.
Buffalo, N(ew) Y(ork)

To Bishop (Peter Paul) Lefevere
(Detroit, Michigan)

Campaux acknowledges receipt of Lefevere's letter assuring Campaux that Lefevere never stated or reported anything derogatory of Campaux's or his brother's character, as Campaux claimed in his letter of the 29th ult. And the case is closed. Campaux hopes an opportunity to show gratitude for Lefevere's many kindnesses may soon arise. He requests Lefevere not to reveal to Campaux's mother what has transpired between them. His bad health has caused him to give up business and be of no assistance to his parents. His health is rapidly improving and he hopes in spring to return to Detroit, and resume his former position.

III-2-j A.L.S. 2pp. 8vo.
1


1862 Feb 7

DeNeve, Father J(ohn)
Louvain, (Belgium)

To Bishop P(eter) P(aul) Lefevere
Detroit, Mich(igan)

DeNeve acknowledges Lefevere's letters of November 14. Father (Edmund) Dumont arrived. He hopes to send 2 priests more to Detroit this year: (Edward) Van Lauwe a deacon preparing for a degree in theology, and Father (Florimond) de Bruycker, who has been DeNeve's assistant for 2 years, although de Bruycker is having difficulty to come to a decision in the matter. The (American) College (at Louvain) is going on first rate; he has his own professor of Scripture, one of English and German, 2 professors especially for elementary theology . DeNeve thinks if the gentlemen who are at the Missions would send some news he would get along very well.

III-2-j A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
5


1862 Feb 8

Fitzgerald, (Father) Edward
Columbus, (Ohio)

To Archbishop John Baptist Purcell
Cincinnati, Ohio

Fitzgerald is just on his way to Bellefontaine and Marion (Ohio) when he receives Purcell's letter. Father (Thomas J.J.) Coppinger is feeling better and will preach tomorrow but; because of his hand, he cannot say Mass. Father (Bernard) Seling will take Coppinger's place tomorrow at St. Patrick's, but Fitzgerald believes Coppinger will soon be in perfect health because now, with the exception of his arm, his health is better than it has been for years.

II-5-b A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
3


1862 Feb 9

Baunach, O.S.B., Father Peter
Fredericksburg, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin) desired for Fredericksburg a church 60' long, 30' broad and 24' high for fear of debts. The good Catholics have built one 80' long without debts because they have amongst themselves masons and stone cutters. They hope to finish the walls in two months, but the roof required wood which must be bought elsewhere. They told Baunach often during the year that (Odin) had promised them $100 for the roof and they hope for it from him. The societies of man, women, and girls will help with money also.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 2pp. 4to.
2


1862 Feb 9

Gonellaz, Father (Hyacinth)
Opelousas, (Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Gonellaz has been waiting and hoping for more than two months. Considering the state of things he would not venture to write yet if he had not acquired, by different ways, the certainty that (Odin) has forgotten what he told him. He reminds him of his promise and asks him to tell him when he will execute it. Father (Gilbert) Raymond owes him more than $200. Which he loaned him, and it is necessary to notify him some time before Gonellaz's departure so that he can pay it all.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 2pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 9

Fay, John J.
Grand Rapids, (Michigan)

to Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere)
(Detroit, Michigan)

Fay expresses sympathy for Father (Martin) Marco who is seriously ill. Fay called the evening before on Marco to find Dr. Blumuch present. The doctor suggested that Fay write to Lefevere, who had ordered the immediate removal of Marco, that due to Marco's serious condition, the doctor would not be responsible for the consequences. The day Marco fell ill he got as far as Mrs. McNamara's home, an attempt to get a conveyance to take him to Fay's house failed. Some bad-hearted persons, Fay fears, have written Lefevere about Marco whom they are disposed to injure whenever the shade of a chance offers. He has been told their efforts will fail. Fay regrets that the priest's house adjoining St. Andrew's (Grand Rapids), is not furnished to accommodate the clergy, both residing and transient; it would seem a necessary improvement to make it so.

III-2-j A.L.S. 3pp. 8vo.
3


1862 Feb 10

Crawford, Sam(ue)l G.
Havana, N(ew) Y(ork)

To O(restes) A. Brownson
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

Crawford desires to correspond with Brownson, although he disapproves of Brownson's religious views. He refers to a passage from The Gospel Advocate which Brownson published while a Universalist. Crawford is still firm in that faith. He believes Brownson acted honestly although he cannot understand Brownson's actions. They agree politically however. He asks that Brownson send some of his productions, especially those pertaining to political subjects.

I-4-b A.L.S. 1p. 8vo.
2


1862 Feb 10

Gonnard, Father J(ohn)
Liberty, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Gonnard seeks some paternal advice. He has spent several days with Father P(eter) Berthet of Liberty. There is much to do. He intends to offer himself to assist Berthet for 6 months or a year. He will do whatever (Odin) advises. As for his mission of Washington and the neighborhood, there would be means to visit it every two months. If there were two priests at Liberty, one could remain at the house and the other travel. Berthet especially dreads his isolation and speaks of leaving if he does not have a colleague. He also hopes to earn the confidence of the (Ursulines). Father (Joseph) Anstaett has led him to understand that he approves everything that he wishes to do. He also knows that someone has written from Galveston to have him named chaplain of the convent there but he has already dreaded such an office. He has neither the head nor the spirit, nor the heart which it requires. Mother Félicité has had to leave New Braunfels where neither her person nor her health were safe. She has been advised to go to Fredericksburg where the priest calls her or to Frelsburg. She is waiting at San Antonio and the 6 or 7 orphans are at New Braunfels with a good lady who cares for them. Some debts have been paid, but not all, and the house can be mortgaged for the total. His health is better than ever. Berthet is also well.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 12mo.
12


1862 Feb 10

Gresselin, (S.J., Father) Ch(arles), Boston College77
(Boston, Massachusetts)

To O(restes) A. Brownson
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

He expected Brownson, but since Brownson did not come, he will write what he intended to say. Public opinion in Brownson's regard has changed. The Catholic community no longer feels deeply with Brownson. The great probability is that Brownson, and not the public, has changed. This has been caused by Brownson's spirit of independence, not well understood. Brownson no longer knows the secret of reconciling two things that seem to clash. This secret cannot be taught; it must be found. Brownson is too independent of authority; he should conform more to the views of the Bishops. Brownson must be liberal with Catholic community. He quotes from the Review, April, 1853, saying that if we are to convert men we must begin by loving them. Brownson's independence is also misapplied in the case of philosophical and theological doctrine. Brownson has said that we do not have men like St. Augustine and St. Bernard in our age because of something lacking in Catholic education. This training is not so bad as Brownson sees it to be. Father Gresselin asks if the public schools belittle genius. Why do they not turn out a Shakespeare or a Milton? God has sprinkled mankind with a small number of extraordinary minds. There is something of far greater importance than genius, and that is truth, without which genius is worse than empty. In philosophical and theological matters truth is not easily made out, except through study. These fields have been covered by those before us, and all new thinking, if it is not thinking truth, is worse than unthinking. Failing to grasp truth, genius will grasp error and turn a plague to man. As Newman says, real and noble independence is but a bondage to truth. Brownson should drop what is objectionable and keep the good. He is still strong and should continue his good work.

I-4-b A.L.S. 4pp. 8vo.
1


1862 Feb 10

Young, O.P., Father N(icholas) D.
Cottage of St. Catherine, (Kentucky)

To Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell
Of Cincinnati, Ohio)

Since writing to (Purcell) Young has received a consoling letter from Bishop (James) Whelan from which he quotes some words in which Whelan acknowledges Young's interest and announces that he has made a vow against the evil. Whelan feels that he can keep the vow. Young has no doubts that Whelan will fulfill these promises and become a worthy bishop. Father (Joseph A.) Kelly (O.P.) the Dominican Provincial at St. Rose has learned from Father (John H.) Lynch, O.P. that Bishop (George) Carrell and other bishops have petitioned Rome for an administrator for the diocese. Young pleads with (Purcell) for a reconsideration of the case. If the matter is stopped now the scandal will be forgotten, but if he is suspended the scandal will spread. Young feels for him, as he has great talent. Young has not heard from Father (Francis) Cubero, and hopes that he is doing well.

A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.

(Purcell), J(ohn) B(aptist), A(rchbishop) of Cincinnati
(Cincinnati, Ohio)

To Archbishop (Peter Richard Kenrick)
of St. Louis, (Missouri)

Purcell thinks it right to show this letter to (Kenrick) to correct an impression expressed in Kenrick's letter. (In Latin) the scandal did not happen "in my house" but in a public tavern where it was seen.

II-5-b A.L.S. 1p. 12mo.
7


(1862 Feb 11)

Gonnard, Father J(ohn
Galveston, Texas)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Gonnard sends him a few words from his heart. Others can express the esteem they have for (Odin) in fine words and well-turned compliments but he consoles himself in thinking that God has given him a loving heart. He wonders who can replace him or earn the general affection of the country as did (Odin). Gonnard's job is not painful or difficult; it consists in examining and noting. His health is good. Father (Philibert) Gutton is pleased and is learning English. He is alone seeing that Gonnard is at Galveston.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 11

Koopmans, Father Ch(arles) P.
Paris, K(entuck)y

to Bishop (Peter Paul) Lefev(e)re
(Detroit, Michigan)

Koopmans feels gratified to tell Lefevere that he (Lefevere) misunderstood his letter, possibly because of Koopman's Dutch-American style and contents. He has no grounds to suppose that his bishop (George Carrell, S.J.) Is in any way dissatisfied; he is certain that he is not. His object in writing Lefevere was to thank him for his too favorable opinion of him, for troubling to ask for him, and for Lefevere's confidence in him. Instead of bettering it, his writing has made it worse.

III-2-j A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
1


1862 Feb 11

McCloskey, Geo(rge)
New York, (New York)

To (Orestes A.) Brownson
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

McCloskey visited the Setons; they were sorry that Brownson could not be there. They expect Brownson next Monday or Tuesday. McCloskey wants to write the Setons so they will know definitely when he and Brownson are coming. They are desirous of securing Brownson's influence in procuring a commission in the Army for their son, William Seton. Seton wants Brownson's signature together with those of General Scott, Hamilton Fish, Governor Morgan, and General King. Seton is a sincere admirer of Brownson's views. William Seton enlisted as a private, has held the positions of corporal and sergeant, and is now a first lieutenant. At present he is stationed at Bush River, Maryland. He is well educated, has traveled extensively and had settled down to a lawyer's practice when the war began. He was under McCloskey's care when a small boy. McCloskey thinks the letter should be sent to the Secretary of War. He requests a reply before Brownson leaves for Wilmington.

I-4-b A.L.S. 4pp. 10mo.
2


1862 Feb 11

Moutard, Father C(ornelius)
Jackson, (Michigan)

to Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere)
(Detroit, Michigan)

Mr. Boyd got the job plastering his church as he was $72 lower than the other bidder in Jackson, a Catholic. A petition is being signed to be sent to Lefevere or him. He explains his procedure in asking for bids foreseeing trouble from Mr. Hoar. Once some of the people understand the case, they will withdraw their signatures. He blames the Irish, and assures Lefevere that he feels at ease over the matter.

III-2-j A.L.S. 4pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 11

Sorin, C.S.C., Father E(dward)
Notre Dame, (Indiana)

to Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell)
of Cin(cinnati, Ohio)

By the last Telegraph he learned of the appointment of Father (Sylvester H.) Rosecrans. He congratulates Purcell and Rosecrans on the event which he considers important. Sorin brought a relic of St. Philii from Rome last year. They would like to make a solemn translation of it into the new chapel they built for the novitiate of the Brothers after the designs of the Portiuncula of St. Francis of Assissi. For this chapel Sorin obtained the indulgences of the famous sanctuary of Assissi and the Holy Father has declared it a regular pilgrimage of devotion to the Blessed Virgin. He would invite several bishops to attend and he asks Purcell to preside.

II-5-b A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
3


1862 Feb 13

(Halle), Augustine Bartholomew, Bishop of
Leitmeriz, Bohemia

to Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell)
of Cincinnati, (Ohio)

The three years which Bishop (Halle) granted to Father Anthony Bermann to work in the diocese of Cincinnati have expired. Because of his need of priests and because Father Bermann wishes to return (Halle) by these letters asks Purcell to release him while at the same time he recalls him to his former diocese. (Purcell) will please send testimonial letters concerning the three years he has worked in the diocese of Cincinnati. He thanks (Purcell) for his kindness to Bermann.

II-5-b A.L.S. (Latin) 3pp. 8vo.
2


1862 Feb 13

(Harrison, R.U.), Mother St. Pierre (Margaret)
Galveston, (Texas)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Mother St. Pierre and Sister St. Alphonse, (R.U.) arrived on the evening of January 26. The joy with which all the Ursulines, except the Mother Assistant (Sister Marie de St. Stanislas, R.U.), received her more than compensated for all the fatigues of her trip. She would have written him then if she had not written a few days before leaving San Antonio. In that letter she quoted a few lines from a letter of Father (Joseph) Anstaett in regard to the secret correspondence between Mother Ste. Séraphine, (R.U.) and Sister St. Stanislas and Sister Ste. Félicité, (R.U.), and she expressed a desire for another confessor in whom she can have confidence. She will never take advice from either Father (Louis C.M.) Chambodut or Anstaett. She asks (Odin) to indicate a priest suitable to direct a Community. Last September the Sisters asked for Father (John) Gonnard. If (Odin) thinks him suitable, she will take him. November 24 she wrote begging him to tell her what he thought of the reflections Mother Ste. Séraphine had made in one of her letters, but as she has never received a reply, she presumes his letter was lost. His letter of January 14 advising her to remain at San Antonio only arrived a week after her departure. However she does not regret having returned. They have 17 day students; a few pay $2 per month, a few $1, and a few, nothing. They have enough provisions thanks to John Kennedy of Houston. He and his wife have truly become friends of the Community. The Olivier Family of Houston are equally inclined to do them some good. She asks him to present her respects to Father (Napoleon Joseph) Perché who appears to have abandoned them in their time of trials as they have not received a word from him since August. When he sees the Devereux Family, he should greet them for her as she owes much gratitude to them.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) pp.. 12mo.
13


1862 Feb 15

Raymond, Father G(ilbert)
Opelousas, (Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Raymond will write in detail on Wednesday. Father (Hyacinth) Gonellaz just told Raymond that he was leaving on March 15 and that he had written to (Odin) yesterday because he said that (Odin) had laughed at him. He begs (Odin) not to reply until he receives his next letter which he will write upon returning from a mission trip.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 2pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 15

Raymond, Father G(ilbert)
Opelousas, (Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Raymond will write in detail Wednesday. Father (Hyacinth) Gonellaz just told Raymond that he was leaving on March 15 and that he had written to (Odin) yesterday because he said the (Odin) had laughed at him. He begs (Odin) not to reply until he receives his next letter which he will write upon returning from a mission trip.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 2pp. 12mo.
2


(18)62 Feb 17

Faure, Father J.A.
San Antonio, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

On receipt of Odin's letter Faure wrote to (A.) Cagnion in the style he had marked out and he came for his money. He sends (Odin) the receipt (no enclosure). He had only $20.10 belonging to the diocese and he added the rest out of the pew rent of the n(ew) c(hurch), $36.40. He advanced Father (Francis) Bouchu $20 out of the moneys of the diocese so up to February 7 he had $40.10 belonging to the diocese for disp(sensations), seminary, and Prop(agation) of the Faith. All his colleagues are well - each doing his duty and all living like brothers in the same house. (Thomas) Hennessy, his student, is with them learning his philosophy. He studies hard and leads an exemplary life. Father (Matthew) Sarry teaches him. Sarry can speak English tolerably well now. The (Ursulines) are all well, the Brothers of Mary also. The nuns could have 50 boarders if they had room. They can accommodate 36 or 38. They have received news from Father (Claude M.) Dubuis, (C.M.). Faure attends to his congregation as well as he can, but they barely pay the current expenses. He has been in Austin. He performed 2 marriages, 6 baptisms, 1 burial, and had about 40 Communions. He was there for 12 days. They are all good people and crave for a priest continually. Faure's health is always very poor. The German fathers of the neighborhood are well. No news from Father Alto H(o)ermann, (O.S.B.). Father (James) Giraudon wrote him the other day. He complains of bad health and says nothing about his parish. Bouchu built a new brick steeple to his chapel. The times are hard with him. Father (Andrew) Farges attends to the ranchos regularly and makes himself useful (at San Antonio).

VI-2-f A.L.S. 4pp. 16mo.
13


1862 Feb 17

(Harrison, R.U.), Mother St. Pierre (Margaret)
Galveston, (Texas)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Mother St. Pierre received his affectionate letter of the 1st and thanks him for his paternal advice. She hopes to acquire the spirit of gentleness which is so necessary for her. Although she finds it difficult to put up with the secret correspondence of the assistant, (Sister Marie de Ste. Stanislas, R.U.) with N(ew) O(rleans), she will follow his advice by not making any further allusions to it. As for the change of confessor, she does not ask it only in her name but in the name of all the (Ursulines). Those who remained at the convent during her absence said that Father (Joseph) Anstaett's conduct was not at all paternal. The lay sisters, Sister (Ste.) Anne, (R.U.), Sister (Mary) Marthe, (R.U.), and Sister (St.) Bernard, (R.U.), suffered much from the Mother Assistant and when they went to Anstaett he was brusque with them. She knows he has been devoted to the convent, but he has spoiled everything by his conduct these last months. She encloses a letter from Father (Joseph) Quérat which will give (Odin) the details of the death of Miss Augustine Adams. Louisa Rost, who was baptized 18 months ago, continues to practice her religion.

A.L.S. (French) 3pp.

Enclosure:

--------
1861 Nov 28

Quérat, Father (Joseph)
Refugio, Texas

to (Mother St. Pierre Harrison, R.U.
Galveston, Texas)

He announces the death of Miss Adams, a faithful convert. On November 10, she was at Mr. Fagan's where she customarily came once every six weeks to assist at the Holy Sacrifice and to approach the Holy Table. The next day she returned to her Father's, 20 miles from the Fagans, who are the nearest Catholic family. November 20 her Father and brother left for Port Lavaca. Hardly had they left when she had a chill. The next day she had another, but neither she nor Miss Duke, who had come to keep her company, thought there was any danger. Nevertheless, towards evening a doctor was called, but could not arrive until Friday. Although all are Protestants, her neighbors sent for Quérat. He arrived too late. They waited for her Father's return to bury her. All her neighbor's paid the greatest respect to her religion which made him feel her loss even more strongly because he feels that her presence had already exerted a kind of apostolate among them. He recalls how much she wished to convert her Father and her brother. It is the greatest loss his mission has ever suffered.

P.S. He received her letter several weeks ago and presented her order to Mrs. Sidick and she promised to do all she could to pay. He has not yet seen Mrs. Doyle. As for Mr. Byrne he replied with insults, saying (the Ursulines) were very punctual in presenting their bills but did not fulfill their obligations toward his children, Mary and Sarah.

A.L.S. (French) 4pp.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 7pp. 12mo.
16


1862 Feb 17

Raymond, Father G(ilbert)
Opelousas, (Louisiana)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Last Saturday Raymond promised to write at greater length and he does so today while traveling. Until (Odin's) visit in September Father (Hyacinth) Gonellaz had not shown that he was discontented. The spirit that he showed at (Odin's) passage made Raymond conclude that he was a secretive man. Since the visit, Raymond did everything to please him and he appeared satisfied. Then, Saturday he said he was leaving on March 15 and that Raymond should have his money ready for him. When Raymond asked him if he had written (Odin) he replied that the Bishop mocks him, that he had written to sound him out, and that he would write in two or three days that (Odin) should no longer count on him after March 15. Raymond had not spoken to Gonellaz about (Odin's) intention of placing him at Royville, but others had told him, for Father (E.J.) Foltier made it public at Lafayette and at the retreat. Raymond then told him that (Odin's) thought had been that he could perhaps go there in April as there was only a bad house to lodge the priest. That appeared hardly to make an impression on him. Raymond has already said that he believes that Gonellaz solid as to morals with a mediocre piety, good character on the outside and ordinary talents, and that he would be capable of rendering services. However, he believes him to be very secretive and that he came (to Opelousas) with the fixed purpose of making money. He has reason to believe that he likes the post which (Odin) planned for him very little and that is what makes him leave. He fancies himself suddenly independent of (Odin) and makes his plans on his own; then he gives his ultimatum. Raymond is convinced that he would not make any repair on the church and priest's house at Royville, at least not with his money. They can do without him (at Opelousas) for the present. He fears that in his private conversations with Father (Clement) Rigol(l)et, Gonellaz has injured him very much. Raymond has done everything for Rigol(l)et; he receives hardly any thanks. That will teach him to beware of adventurers. He hopes (Odin) will not be angry if he begs him not to French priest (Father Ambroise Martin?) who had landed at Opelousas in a cassock. Father (Stephen) Rousselon had asked him what he thought of him and he replied that he believed him a little cracked in the head. He hopes he does well at St. Theresa's but he fears that one day (Odin) will perceive what he told Rousselon. He hopes (Odin) will not tell Gonellaz what he is writing. He will be ready to settle with him on March 15. (Odin) promised to take care of Calcassieu and to place a religious community there. He hopes he does so quickly. He is going to see if Rigol(l) et wants to go there for an immediate tour. He does not know where Gonellaz wants to go; perhaps to Mexico since he has learned Spanish.

P.S. The $28 are for Charleston.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 4to.
11


1862 Feb 18

Gonnellaz, Father (Hyacinth)
Opelousas, (Louisiana)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin's) kind reply surprised Gonellaz very much. He would never have expected that a want of priests was a reason for leaving him (at Opelousas). When he arrived more than six months ago, Father (Gilbert) Raymond, and Father (J. Francois) Raymond did everything. He was alone with them for four months and he knew only that there remained nothing to do; since then their work has diminished. (Odin) speaks of abandoned missions. He wonders why leave him there without anything to do. Since January 1 he has had only 8 baptisms, 2 burials, and a marriage. He has not seen a single sick person. (Odin) speaks of going to look for missionaries. If it is for them to work like he does, it is hardly worth the trouble. It is not his fault. For more than eight months he has asked only freedom to work. After more than a year in the diocese, he has nothing to demonstrate his devotion but words.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 3pp. 12mo.
4


1862 Feb 19

Farrell, John, Bishop of
Hamilton, (Ontario)

To Bishop (Francis P.) McFarland of
Hartford Providence, Rhode Island

He has received McFarland's letter of February 17 concerning Father P. Sherry. What Farrell said in his letter is true but he would not wish to recommend him for sobriety or morality. Sherry will tell why he left the diocese of Chicago. Farrell advised him to make a good retreat and even to seek a refuge in a religious community.

I-1-b A.L.S. 2pp. 8vo.
3


1862 Feb 19

Fitzgerald, (Father) Edward
Columbus, (Ohio)

To Archbishop John Baptist Purcell
Cincinnati, Ohio

Fitzgerald just returned from the Bellefontiane Missions and complies with Purcell's requests through Father (Thomas J.J.) Coppinger. He announced the places he attended that a pastor had been appointed and would take over before Sunday. Fitzgerald knows of no preparations having been made for the new pastor. The necessities for saying Mass, with the exception of a Chalice and Wine can be found at the principal stations. While on the mission he heard the confessions of some of the Germans scattered throughout the territory. At Kenton, Ohio there are over 100 German speaking families and Fitzgerald tells Purcell of the need for a German speaking priest because they are leaving the Church and becoming Lutherans. Father Coppinger's health is improving.

II-5-b A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
3


1862 Feb 19

Gresselin, (S.J.), (Father) Ch(arles)
Boston, (Massachusetts)

To (Orestes A. Brownson)
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

When Father Gresselin quoted Brownson against himself, it was not merely to show a change. It was to show that Brownson's former writings were very fine, and, using them as a standard, he judges Brownson's present writings. Brownson says that his works should be judged according to whether or not they are Catholic. Brownson has said nothing un-Catholic, but strict Catholicity is not enough. Father Gresselin argues with a person not merely on account of his disagreement with authority, but also because that authority, as represented by several persons is moral evidence of their having truth on their side. Unlike Brownson, he sees no difference between dogma and its human explication and application. However, if Brownson means the various systems which have grown around the dogma, then some change can take place. Still it is not our fault if we are too late and can find no new system of explication. According to a Review of 1861, Brownson speaks not of systems but of the conception of the dogma itself, and offers heretics as proof; but heretics do not truly represent the human mind. History offers no examples of new explications or application of dogma. Perhaps the truth of a proposition was not known, but not so its meaning, and therefore in its conception the human mind did not vary. The papers announced Brownson as coming to lecture in behalf of abolitionism. To reject this theory is no moral or political sin; many true Unionists, including Father (John) Bapst reject it. Afraid that perhaps Brownson's political friends would be meeting him at the house for discussions, Father Bapst acted accordingly. That is why Brownson was greeted with the unwelcome compliment. Of course Brownson asked nothing, leaving them nothing to refuse, and this should be a good lesson for Father Bapst. He should have received Brownson's kind visit and thanked him for it, but he wished to speak openly and frankly, feeling that this way was more noble.

I-4-b A.L.S. 4pp. 4to.
2


1862 Feb 20

Barry, Father William James
Mt. St. Mary's, (near Cincinnati, Ohio)

To Archbishop (John Baptist Purcell
of Cincinnati, Ohio)

He told Purcell Sunday the charge that (George) Konig brought against Mr. Hemsteger. Konig and Hemsteger were cronies in the seminary. As Konig was an evil influence, Barry made Hemsteger keep away from him. He gives a detailed account of the charges against the two. Konig was dismissed from the seminary but nothing was proved against Hemsteger. (Enclosed a statement of two young ladies about the conduct of Konig and Hemsteger).

II-5-b A.L.S. pp. 8vo.
1


1862 Feb 20

Brownson, Henry F.

Brownson is commissioned a Second Lieutenant, as of December 1, 1861. Signed by President Abraham Lincoln and Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton.

III-3-h Printed D.S. 1p. Folio
2


1862 Feb 20

(Elder), William Henry, Bishop of
Natchez, (Mississippi)

To Archbishop J(ohn) M(ary) Odin, (C.M.)
New Orleans, (Louisiana)

Odin's letter of the 14th reached (Elder). His conscience has been troubled about their Confederate soldiers left without priests. He will make an effort to send one as Odin desires. He is not well enough acquainted with Father (Henry) Picherit, but he thinks he can send another. His uneasiness of conscience has arisen partly from reading the letters in the newspapers deploring the vice among soldiers, sometimes speaking of so many Protestant parsons, and sometimes lamenting the want of clergymen. Captain Wood from Columbus tells him that Father (Joseph T.) Jarboe is in the camp near his company, (Elder) supposes as Chaplain to a Tennessee Reg)imen)t. He is thinking of sending Father (Julian M.) Guillou and, failing him, Father (Francis X.) Leray. Their people seem disheartened by the continued reverses of the last two weeks. At present he does not see the determination and vitality necessary to success. For some time he has been disheartened at the want of religious fervor among them. He is determined to conform their regulations for Lent to Odin's.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
5


1862 Feb 20

Moutard, Father C(ornelius)
Jackson, (Michigan)

to Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere)
(Detroit, Michigan)

The great "instrument" has fallen into his hands. Only 6 decent persons have signed it, and they have withdrawn their signatures. It does not amount to anything, so far, and Lefevere should rest easy. A bad cold will prevent Moutard from coming to Detroit before Monday next.

A.L.S. 1p. 12mo.

Enclosure:

--------
1862 Feb 17

Cahill, Edward and others
Jackson, (Michigan)

To Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere) Leffver
(Detroit, Michigan)

The undersigned Catholics of Jackson protest against Father C(ornelius) Moutard's letting the plastering of St. John's Church to Mr. Boyd of Detroit. (Cahill and 47 others sign).

A.L.S. 2pp. 4to.

III-20j A.L.S. 3pp. 4to. & 12mo.
3


1862 Feb 21

Acquarone, (Father) L.
Gloucester, Mass(achusetts)

To Orestes A. Brownson
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

The remarks concerning Brownson in the (Boston) Pilot are a blunder. He has not seen the Review for some years, and wishes Brownson to send the numbers of 1861 and the one for 1862 if he has them at hand. He would also like a Catholic Almanac.

I-4-b A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 21

Chambodut, Father L(ouis) C.M.
Galveston, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin's) letter of February 1 was 16 days en route; it appears that the roads between Beaumont and New Iberia are impassable. Chambodut has distributed the Mass intentions that P. Rotchford charged them with so that one or two will be said each day for his intention. He gave 100 to Father (John Claude) Neraz and Father (Sebastian) Augagneur, 50 to Father (Peter) Berthet, 40 to Father (John) Gonnard, 40 to Father (Charles) Padey, 40 to Father (Joseph) Anstaett and 30 to himself. Father (Philibert) Gutton received (Odin's) letter and is preparing to leave for N(ew) Orleans. Chambodut awaits (Odin's) pastoral letter to guide him in what to say to his colleagues of Texas. Provisions are scarce and horribly dear; at Galveston where fish is so abundant in ordinary times it can be had only with difficulty. He has just received a letter from Father (Claude) Jacquet; he is very content with his new post. The pastor of Mier, Father Francisco Benavides, to whom (Odin) had accorded faculties to baptize, marry, etc. in the diocese of Galveston, asks Chambodut to renew his powers, but Father (Louis M.) Planchet complains of him in a vague manner, and he complains of Planchet, and as Chambodut does not know Benavides, he asks (Odin's) advice. Mr. (Coffey) Coffee gave them as certain what was only conjecture. Dr. (Jeremiah) Cummings wrote Chambodut but he did not say a word about bulls. It seems to him that in his conversation with C(offey) he told him that in San Antonio they had assured him that Father (Claude M.) Dubuis, C.M., would come soon with the pastoral cross, and Chambodut told him that he believed the bulls had arrived and he hoped they would soon know who would be their bishop. The news that (Odin) gives him of Louisiana is very sad; (Odin) has lost 4 priests in a few weeks. (H.) De St. Cyr has been indisposed for two days with a cold. Poor Dr. (J.C.) Jordan does not know what to do; he is without money and does not know when he will have any; people do not wish to pay him. J(ames) P. Nash is assessor; his family has just returned from Brazoria. Nathan Smith is to build his last house. De St. Cyr had rented out the building of the Ursulines as a hospital but, as the religious did not wish to serve the sick, it was withdrawn to another neighborhood. He asks (Odin) to pray for the first priest he had ordained for the Texas mission.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 12mo.
21


1862 Feb 21

Kasson, John A.
(Washington, D.C.)

To W(illia)m B. Taylor, Postmaster
New York, N(ew) Y(ork)

In reply to Taylor's letter of Feb. 20, the Postmaster General will consider readmitting the Freeman's Journal and Daily News to the mails if they give similar proofs of good faith to those given by the Journal of Commerce. The latter paper, discarding the sentiments of the late editor, placed in charge a man whose loyalty to the Constitution and the Union was not doubted, and who is vouched for by responsible gentlemen engaged in aiding the Government put down rebellion or treason. The publishers of these papers can give similar guarantees, local assurances of which are needed by this department before it can take a chance on distributing matter designed to destroy the very government of which it is a part.

I-1-m A.L.S. (Copy) 2pp. 8vo.
3


1862 Feb 21

Rice, C.M.
Hidalgo, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

(Odin's) letter was received and Mrs. R ice would have answered immediately, but she wished to be able to give him some satisfactory answers about the money advanced to Chapter (Rice) last summer. She wrote to Charleston requesting the amount should be forwarded to (Odin), but receiving no intimation to that effect, she handed $30 to Father (Philibert) Gutton for him. She asks him to accept her thanks for the kindness rendered by Father (Stephen) Rousselon in his absence. Ill health, brought on by exposure in the long march, has compelled Chapter to ask for a discharge. He is at present in S(outh) Carolina. She asks (Odin) to remember him in his prayers, that the gift of Faith may be bestowed upon him. Gutton's piety and kindness have endeared him to their hearts and this sudden recall is a great sorrow. Father (John) Gonnard is still in Galveston and they are all most afraid that his health will not permit him to remain permanently with them. She asks (Odin) to use his influence with whoever may be bishop of Texas that they may never be deprived of having their own pastor. Their chapel would be a desolate place and for the poor servants, with whom so much has been done, the loss would be irreparable. Her brothers and their families unite with her in the most respectful remembrances.

VI-2-f A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
6


1862 Feb 22

Barry, W(illia)m Ja(me)s
Cin(cinna)ti, Ohio

to O(restes) A. Brownson
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

If Brownson still has the manuscript of Barry's article on Pombal, sent from Wheeling, Virginia, he is asked to return it. Barry is convinced that publication would do no good; he has begun to doubt the truth of some of the assertions he made in the article because of later readings.

I-4-b A.L.S. 1pg. 16to.
1


1862 Feb 22

Kasson, John A.
(Washington, D.C.)

To W(illia)m B. Taylor, Postmaster,
of New York City

The Post Master General will consider readmitting the Freeman's Journal to the mail when it manifests proof of good faith, similar to those given by the Journal of Commerce, which paper put its columns under the control of a man whose loyalty was not doubted. The proprietor of this paper can further similar guaranties. Responsible local assurances are needed before the Department can distribute the Journal again.

I-1-m A.L.S. 2pp. 8vo.
2


1862 Feb 23

Gresselin, (S.J., Father), Ch(arles)
Boston, (Massachusetts)

To (Orestes A. Brownson)
(Elizabeth, New Jersey)

He has received from a student at the American College a letter concerning a recent decree of the Inquisition. The student has been told that it is a blow at Ontologism. The propositions were sent to the Inquisition by a French Ecclesiastic; their judgement has caused the demand that the sense in which they were found false be made known, and the congregation is now working on this answer. Father Gresselin always fells regret after having written to Brownson, because he is afraid he will cause Brownson pain.

I-4-b A.L.S. 1p. 8vo.
1


1862 Feb 24

Bertail, Father J.M.
Paincourtville, (Louisiana)

To Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

In accord with (Odin's) circular of December 6, 1861 calling for each pastor to join himself to three parishioners to form an administrative council, Bertail has chosen Séverin Crochet, Lenfroid Guidry and Henri Daigle for the chapel of Pierre-Part.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 1p. 16mo.
5


1862 Feb 24

Eldridge, R.D.
Per
Stanford, Tho(ma)s H.
Baltimore, M(arylan)d

to (Orestes A. Brownson)
Elizabeth, New Jersey

They have received the Review for January through the politeness of M.F. Conway of Kansas. They are Protestants and would be Catholic but for a scepticism that prevents them from having faith in something they cannot understand. However they have no fixed religious principles. Eldridge liked very much Brownson's article on "The Struggles of a Nation for Life." They endorse the treatment of the subject as a whole but think that some of the propositions are fallacious. They ask if Brownson knows the book, of which the enclosed is a review, and also ask his opinion of the author's other works.

I-4-b A.L.S. 3pp. 10mo.
3


1862 Feb 24

Gaudet, O.M.I., Father A(ugustine)
Brownsville, (Texas)

to Archbishop (John Mary Odin, C.M.
New Orleans, Louisiana)

Gaudet received (Odin's) letter of the 19th accompanied by an ordo and several tracts for the time which prove that Father (Napoleon Joseph) Perché also received a letter. As (Odin) spoke of going to Europe if politics permit, he hastens to say that he would like to accompany him. Although the Chap(ter) General has probably already elected a new Sup(erio)r Gen(era)l for the (Oblates of Mary Immaculate), a visit would be very advantageous for their mission. (Odin) says he does not wish to remain long; Gaudet would like to be back in November or December. What (Odin) tells him of (P.) Rotchford gives him great pleasure. He sent the letter to Fred(erick) O. Boyle. The poor young man is still at Matamoros as guardian of the Tarnava house. The war there is more furious than ever. On their side, the blockade has been effective for 15 days. Until now they have had nothing to fear but they are apprehensive. The city is always crowded. Both they and the Sisters (of the Incarnate Word) bear everything well.

VI-2-f A.L.S. (French) 4pp. 12mo.
8


1862 Feb 24

Hendricken, Father Thomas F.
Waterbury, Conn(ecticut)

to Bishop (Francis P. McFarland of
Hartford Providence, Rhode Island)

Hendricken will do all McFarland requires regarding Mr. Burnand. He has seen him frequently since his return but has had little conversation with him. He encloses (no enclosure) a statement of his church account. In other matters it is the same, except that interests and bills then not in, increased his indebtedness. He hopes the Bishop is not surprised. He did the best he could. After next week Father (Isadore) Daubresse will give a mission to the men of the parish and he wishes faculties for him. His assistants are in good health and he feels that he can do with one, now that his health is better. He can control the debts and gradually diminish the debt. He spread 2000 copies of his report among the congregation.

I-1-b A.L.S. 3pp. 8vo.
3


1862 Feb 24

McKey, Mother Angela J(oseph)
Grand Rapids, Mich(iga)n

to Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere)
(Detroit, Michigan)

Mother Angela (of the Sisters of St. Bridget) acknowledges Lefevere's favor of the 19th. Money received from contributions for a residence had to be spent for rental. The trustees, since last July, have given her only $43, and the school has not brought her one cent all this time; she has had to pay an assistant teacher to satisfy the people. She travels twice a day to the school in all kinds of weather, a proof she is not flinching from duty. Some who have paid part of their contributions were so excited by Father (Thomas) Brady before he left, that they want to get back the money they gave. All the Bradys are gone: the doctor; the lawyer; and many of the troublesome ones. Before Brady left, he did all he could to turn the people against her. She hopes shortly under Father J(oseph) Kindekens all will be right. She has taken a 6 year old half-orphaned girl; the mother will clothe her and pay $3 a month.

P.S. The total demand on her cannot be more than $50. Peter Granger is an agent of Brady.

III-2-j A.L.S. 4pp. 12mo.
4


(18)62 Feb 24

(Seton, E)Liz(abeth)
Cragdon, (New York)

To (Robert Seton) Bob
(Rome, Italy)

Bob's famous box has at last been forwarded; he is to be on the lookout at Shea's; Emily (Seton) says she is a house agent. Liz hopes (Robert) received the $500 that Mr. Glover sent. Bill (William Seton 4) is at Perryman's near Havre de Grace; he belongs to Durea's Brigade. Fritz (Frederick Prime?) has been exchanged and is now home on 30 days furlough; his wound is healing fast. Aunt Ray has been very kind to Will procuring him letters from Washington. Em and Liz visited all their relations; (Robert) was much asked after. Harry (Seton) writes that he is just over typhus fever. (Robert) is to tell Father (Bernard) Smith to try to push for Harry's commission; they are afraid he may come home without it. When does (Robert) propose to send those relics from Scotland? Nell (Helen Seton) has written a long letter to Bell (Isabel Seton). General (John Gray?) Foster is of the Volunteers, he is a Major in the Regulars with General Burnside. Father, Em, and Nell join in love.

II-1-a A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
11


1862 Feb 25

( )
Jackson, (Michigan)

to Bishop P(eter) P(aul) Lefev(e)re
(Detroit, Michigan)

Father C(ornelius) Moutard promised the plastering of the church to Mr. Miller and Mr. Hoar. They have got up a remonstrance against the Detroit man. Since they have to pay the money, they think they should have some say. Moutard also announced that no couple could be married without calling the banns 3 times. On the same day he married a couple, and the following week three couples without a call. This is written in behalf of the Catholics of Jackson - 64 of the congregation. They withhold their names.

III-2-j A.L.S. 3pp. 12mo.
3


1862 Feb 25

Acquarone, (Father) Luigi
Gloucester, Mass(achusetts)

To (Patrick) Donahoe
(Boston, Massachusetts)

Acquarone denies that anyone can assert that pride has blinded (Orestes A.) Brownson. Brownson's acts are of a most daring and responsible nature. Donahoe has no right to condemn Brownson in the Review. The "legal Catholic Authority"on the subject should omit his decree." He advises Donahoe to write a recantation in a manner not to nullify himself. Donahoe's writers are too clumsy for efficient and decent recantation. (In Brownson papers).

I-4-b A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 25

(St. Palais), Maurice (de), Bishop of
Vincennes, (Indiana)

To (Archbishop John Baptist Purcell)
of (Cincinnati, Ohio)

His absence from Vincennes prevented him from answering Purcell's letter but he hopes Purcell made use of the power he has for the diocese of Vincennes. (De St. Palais) made a visit to his confrere (Bishop John H. Luers) of Fort Wayne and is happy to say that he did not make a mistake in choosing Fort Wayne as the episcopal see.

II-5-b A.L.S. (French) 2pp. 12mo.
2


1862 Feb 28

Conkling, F( ) A. per Lennox
Washington, (D.C.)

To J(ames) A(lphonsus) McMaster
(New York, New York)

He lost no time in laying McMaster's letter of Feb. 26 before the First Assistant Post Master General who has furnished the enclosed copy of a letter addressed to W(illiam) B. Taylor, Post Master at N(ew) Y(ork). Mr. (John Adam) Kasson's reply to McMaster's propositions was that the Department could not comply with such conditions. The only terms upon which McMaster can be permitted to enjoy the facilities for distributing the (Freeman's Journal) are those set forth in the enclosed letter.

I-1-m A.L.S. 2pp. 12mo.
3