(1855 Aug.)
(Ives, Dr. Levi Silliman:
New York, New York)
to (Orestes A.) Brownson:
(New York, New York)
Brownson's letter to Father (Isaac T.) Hecker indicates the desire to have (Ives') article. (Part of message is cut out here.) It comprises some 40 pages. It is directed mainly to the second letter of Bishop (John H. Hopkins) with only a passing notice to the answer of Archbishop (Francis Patrick Kenrick.) (Ives) would like to see Brownson. Perhaps he will come with his manuscript. (Identified and dated by reference to letter from Ives to Brownson of Aug. 28, 1856, and letters from Brownson to Hecker of June 1855 and Aug. 29, 1855.)
I-3-l - A.L. (Signature cut out) - 2pp. - 12mo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 1
Brummer, Father J(ohn) W.:
Mt. St. Mary's (Noble Co. Ohio)
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
Brummer sees in the Telegraph that Purcell will visit St. Patrick's at Washington, Guernsey Co. on the 12th. Brummer will meet Purcell in Cambridge and drive him to Washington. The church is to be dedicated and 30 are to be confirmed. At St. Mary's the church is to be dedicated and 40 are to be confirmed. Brummer has an offer for a large lot for a church at Belaire. There will be over 20 at Cranesnest; he has appointed Mr. James Hilliard to instruct them. The people would like to see Father (Bernard) Hengehold again if Purcell could bring him along. Brummer would like to see Father (Henry D.) Juncker along. He has hard work to get everything ready.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {9}
1855 Aug. 1
Fransoni, Cardinal J(ames) Ph(ilip):
Rome, (Italy)
to Archbishop Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
Fransoni received Blanc's letter of June 18 in which he reported several things about the purposes of the Provincial Synod of Baltimore and about the proposed seminary for all those ecclesiastical provinces. These things will be considered in a general meeting of the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda. Blanc described the controversy between the bishops of Natchez and Chicago. Fransoni thinks it would be better to send a letter again to Bishop (Anthony O'Regan so that he might inform Blanc about everything pertaining to the affair. Fransoni returns the rescript of faculties for confraternities, likewise the letter of the S(acred) C(ongregation) about the proposed censure for José Pascual. Al(exander) Barnabò signs as secretary.
VI-1-i - L.S. - (Latin) - 1p. - 4to. - {5}
1855 Aug. 1
McCaffrey, Father John:
Mt. St. Mary's (Emmittsburg, Maryland
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
Mr. James O'Donuoghue, obedient to Purcell's summons, will leave here tomorrow. His professor has always been satisfied with him and he has answered creditably at every examination. He could not be more regular and exact in his conduct. As he is so innocent, so wanting in worldly wisdom, it would not be wise to place him at once in charge of a congregation. With time he will be a very useful priest, McCaffrey sent Mr. Barry to see Purcell but hopes that he will return.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 12mo. - {3}
1855 Aug. 1
Lamy, Bishop Juan:
Santa Fé, (New Mexico)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
(Blanc)'s vicar general has no doubt told him that Lamy wrote in the winter to ask him to advance $250 to Mr. Johnson of Seguin, Texas and to send this sum through Father (Claude M.) Dubuis of San Antonio. Lamy could repay (Blanc) next year. He congratulates (Blanc) on being present on the occasion of the decree of the Immaculate Conception. The little band of missionaries which Lamy brought from France, gives him much consolation but the vacancies are not all filled and he will probably soon be obliged to do it again. (Blanc) has probably seen in the newspapers how they live because of the Indians who become bolder every day. In June on property belonging to the church, 5 leagues from Santa Fé, they killed a shepherd, took his young brother prisoner, and took away several valuable animals. They can no longer leave their houses and villages without an escort. 500 volunteers have pursued them for 6 months, killing several, but the Indians only become more furious. It would take 5000 men to punish them. Lamy asks (Blanc) to give his respects to the Ursulines for their kindness to Lamy's little niece (Marie Lamy). If the child had a vocation for religious life, Lamy could have her come to Santa Fé to their Sisters of Loretto but she is still too young. She should write to Lamy a little oftener, as well as to her parents and grandmother. They are trying to establish their boys' school.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 3pp. - 4to. - {6}
1855 Aug. 1
Roduit, S.J., Father Jos(eph):
Grand Coteau, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
He received (Blanc)'s letter of July 27, two days ago. Roduit sees no difficulty with the plan. Mother (Amélie?) Jouve, (R.S.C.J.) asks Roduit to tell (Blanc) that she would be very glad to have Confirmation at the convent as early as September 1. Distribution of prizes will take place on the second. In the parish, Confirmation could be on September 2 after the High Mass and on the 3rd at the chapel at the Junction. Father (A.) Uzannaz, (S.J.) whose health is considerably improved, and Father (Eugene) Plantaz, (S.J.) who is to arrive here around the 17th or 20th of August, will help Roduit with the necessary preparations. All is going quite well around here. Yesterday they celebrated the feast of St. Ignatius. If the congregation did not seem very eager, the pastors were not lacking. They came from all the parishes in the area. Father (Joseph Outendirck) Outenderik said the Community Mass at the convent; Father (Ange Marie) Jan sang the High Mass. Father (Gilbert) Raymond, accompanied by his whole community, gave the solemn benediction and preached. Fathers (John F.) Raviol and (Anthony) de Chaignon, (S.J.) also took part. What pleased Roduit the most was the joy with which they all saw each other again. Roduit presumes that (Blanc) will arrive by boat. The Ladies will see that their carriage is at Port Barre (?) when he arrives.
VI-1-i - A.L.S - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {10}
1855 Aug. 1
(Purcell), Archbishop J(ohn) B(aptist):
Cincinnati, (Ohio)
to Archbishop Ant(hony) Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
The Ursulines are not prepared at present to let any of their members go to Texas and the Sisters of Notre Dame have had so many places waiting for them, Salem, Mass(achusetts); Columbus, Ohio; St. Joseph's, Cincinnati; and probably the German female orphan asylum, that they cannot undertake a new establishment at this time. They may a little later. (Purcell) admitted eleven new novices to the retreat for the vows of profession to be made next week. Here is a present for Blanc and a treasure: an intelligent, Zealous priest from Bordeaux, Father Faure, fit for Blanc's cathedral or any church. (Purcell) has the disposal of him; Faure will go by the first boat. (Purcell) has not seen Bishop Portier. (Purcell) is much pleased with his trip to Kentucky. He sends his regards to Father Rousselon. (P.S.) (Purcell)'s delay in writing was in part owing to the difficulty of getting an answer from the nuns.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 1
Timon, John Bp. Buffalo:
Buffalo, New York
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
Father Weninger told Timon of Purcell's agreement to let Father (William Deiters come under certain conditions. By ceding Deiters to the church of St. Louis, Purcell will render a great service to religion and will add to the beauty of his crown. Father (Francis X.) Wenniger thinks that he can get a German priest from Milwaukee to take Deiters' place; if not Timon will send a German priest no matter what the sacrifice. So far the results in St. Louis Church have been most cheering.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 8vo. -
1855 Aug. 2
(Martin), Bishop Aug(uste) M(ar)ie:
Natchitoches, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Mr. Pitot(?) leaves tomorrow morning and will take a letter for (Blanc). (Martin) wants (Blanc)'s advice. He has no vicar general and being obliged to be absent more and more often, he has had to confide the dispensations to Father (Felix) Dicharry. Would it not be well to make him Vicar general? He fulfills his charge as pastor of the Cathedral and teaching theology to the seminarians with zeal and talent. He has solid piety and uncommon knowledge for his age. He is destined to have a powerful influence later. But is it not too soon to elevate him to an important position with responsibility for which he would not be sufficiently prepared? Father (Hector) F(igari,C.M.?) has good qualities and will be useful to the diocese but would not have (Martin)'s confidence. (Martin) will rely on (Blanc)'s judgment.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 3pp. - 4to. - {4}
1855 Aug. 3
Clarke, Mrs. C.E.T.:
Houston, (Texas)
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
Boston, Massachusetts)
Brownson promised to introduce her to a published when she finished her story. Mrs. Clarke tells Brownson she is well along with the book she is writing. She asks his advice about the title and whether to publish it under her own name or anonymously. Mrs. Clarke tells Brownson what her story purports to do in showing the needs and advantages in belonging to the Catholic Church and marrying one of the same faith. She confesses that she is timid in approaching any published and asks him if he can recommend one or her to contact. She also tries to show the triumph of the Catholic religion over every earthly attachment.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 4pp. - 8mo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 3
Nesmith, Mary (D.):
Inwood, (New York)
to Bishop (James Roosevelt) Bayley:
(Newark, New Jersey)
Nesmith hopes Bayley has returned from his cottage at Rockaway and will be ready on Monday to retreat to his other little villa on Staten Island. They are to visit Mr. Nesmith's relatives and propose leaving on next Thursday. Mr. Nesmith requests that Bayley join them the early part of the week and make use of their quiet retreat here during their absence. It need only be known that Bayley is there to insure plenty of company. Bayley is to send her the other linen rochet; she would like to get them in good order. Bayley should let them know if they may expect him on Monday.
II-2-n - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 12mo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 4
Spalding, M(artin) J(ohn), Bishop of:
Louisville, (Kentucky)
to Bishop (Peter Paul) Lefevere:
Detroit, (Michigan)
Spalding has been unwell for more than two weeks but as he is now nearly recovered he will be able to commence the retreat at Detroit on September 6 and end it on the eleventh or twelfth. P.S. Know Nothings beaten in Tennessee and North Carolina. Kentucky election on the 6th, result doubtful. P.S. Because of appointments before and after the retreat he cannot change the time.
III-2-i - A.L.S. - 1p. - 8vo. - {1}
(18)55 Aug. 4
Gouesse, (C.S.C.), Father F(rancis):
New York, (New York)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
On July 15, Gouesse wrote to (Blanc) and to Father (Edward F.) Sorin, (C.S.C.) about the excorporation which Bishop (Maurice de St. Palais of Vincennes said he had sent to Le Lac at the request of Sorin at the time of Gouesse's departure for New Orleans. Today Gouesse is still without a reply from Le Lac or New Orleans. (Blanc)'s silence is surprising and since he relies greatly on the confidence (Blanc) has pledged him so graciously, Gouesse writes him again. Despite his desire to spend his life under (Blanc)'s jurisdiction, with the thought that (Blanc) might not have a post for him because of the Congregation of Holy Cross established in (Blanc)'s diocese, he saw nothing to do but ask for his exeat, if it had been sent to (Blanc). Knowing (Blanc)'s dispositions toward him and wishing to do all the good possible in the United States, he would like from (Blanc) a certificate of all the time he spent as an assistant priest to (Blanc)'s clergy, which he could use as a recommendation. This was the object of his first letter. If he has been too presumptuous he asks pardon and if Le Lac still wishes to thwart his wishes, they will have difficulty doing so. Gouesse only awaits a word from (Blanc) to resume work with courage and vigor in the place providence reserves for him.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 3pp. - 4to. - {4}
1855 Aug. 4
Raymond, Father G(ilbert):
Opelousas, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony) Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Several days ago, Raymond received the letter (Blanc) wrote from Donaldsonville in which he announced the time of Confirmation. About five weeks ago, Raymond wrote about several important affairs. About 3 weeks ago he wrote about a marriage dispensation; he has just received a letter from Father (Stephen) Rousselon granting it. Last night Raymond learned that many dispatches from here to New Orleans had not been received. So he will repeat what he had said. Father (Joseph A.) Botti has been here for some time. He is a native of Italy, first studied medicine and then theology and was ordained. He was employed in education and ministry and did well. Later, an Austrian prince having married an Italian princess, there was a need of someone to fill a secondary place in the chaplaincy of the princess. Botti was appointed. He remained a good number of years at the Vienna court. After 1848, Botti left Vienna and went to Milan. He was urged by the Archbishop and vicar general to preach in favor of Italian independence. Many of the clergy were in favor of the revolution. However, the Italians were defeated and Marshal (Joseph Wenzel) Radetsky put them to flight. Botti was exiled with the other patriots. Up to that time, Botti had lived as a priest. He took refuge in Switzerland; there he ceased to exercise the ministry. Later the Italian refugees were obliged to leave Switzerland and Botti went to New York. Bishop (John) Hughes on learning of his part in Italian affairs, received Botti coldly, telling him that he had no place for him but that if he went to Philadelphia, perhaps Bishop (John Nepomucene) Neuman(n) could use him. This shook Botti's good resolution. In Philadelphia he did not bother to find Neuman(n), an Austrian and strongly opposed to the Italians who took part in the movement against Austria. He was in this disposition when Justinian, the apostate Italian priest, came to see him and told him that he could hope for nothing from Neuman(n) nor the Catholics, that the only thing to do was to join the Protestants who would receive him well and give him a means of living. Without being convinced, and remaining Catholic at heart, he joined a Protestant church exteriorly. They wanted him to preach in favor of Protestantism but he eluded it. He sought to revive his medical knowledge; he understood that if he went to New Orleans at the time of the yellow fever, he would do well. He left for New Orleans armed with a letter of recommendation from the Protestant minister. But on arriving he fell ill of the fever and was very weak for a long time. At New Orleans he had known a woman from Strasbourg who came to Opelousas to teach French in a school held by a former Anabaptist minister who wrote to Botti to come to teach one hour a day. Botti still had the faith in his heart. One day when the doctor came to see Botti, he asked the doctor to write to Raymond to come to see him. In the first meeting, Botti told him of his remorse. In the second, he began his confession. But they began to persecute him at the Protestant school and he quit. He lived for a time at Washington. He resumed his breviary and attended church services regularly. For some time he has thought of establishing himself as a doctor at Bayou des Cannes. However, he would prefer a position as a professor in a Catholic college. He would like to spend some time in a retreat house. He would have liked to join the Benedictines if his family had not been opposed to it. If after a time he could be rehabilitated he would take the most abandoned post (Blanc) would have for him. Botti is waiting impatiently for the reply to the letter Raymond wrote about him long ago. Raymond also wrote about Father (John F.) Raviol; he will repeat what he said in his last letter. A Mr. Sabin came to see him, saying he had a sister who had worked for Raviol. She declares that her child is Raviol's and wants Raviol to provide for it. She wishes to keep the secret but wishes also that Raviol keep his promises. She is living now at Dr. Cacher's. Sabin went to see Raviol who replied only by saying, "This woman is a poor wretch" and said he would loan her money. She says he promised to give it to her. Raymond cannot say absolutely that it is true, so many innocent have been calumniated. (H.) Picherit and (Rene) Pineau have begun the last treatises in theology required for the priesthood. (Blanc) can examine them when he comes. When Raymond saw (Blanc) at New Orleans, he said to write when they were almost ready. (Blanc) said he would ask for a dispensation from Rome for More surety. (Blanc) knows the extent of his faculties and the interpretation of the papal bull for his diocese. They will do what (Blanc) judges best. Raymond was very sad to hear of the death of the pastor of Algiers. The people of Opelousas and Washington learned with much Pleasure the news of (Blanc)'s coming.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 4pp. - 4to. - {12}
1855 Aug. 5
Mullon, Father J(ames) I(gnatius):
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
to (Archbishop Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Returns and expenditures for July for (St. Patrick's Church).
VI-1-i - A.D.S. - 1p. - folio - {2}
1855 Aug. 6
Brands, (C.M.), Father John:
Galveston, (Texas)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
According to instruction from their Bishop (John Mary Odin), Brands asks (Blanc) to honor a draft; it is for money (Odin) received at Paris for a person residing in Galveston. Brands also had to clothe their missionary, Father (Eudald) Estany, (C.M.), pay taxes and expenses of Brands' 3 weeks sickness from a bilious fever from which he is now almost recovered. This week he will have to buy water which people are glad to have for $2 a barrel. Father (Michael) Calvo, C.M. has just written that Mr. Pfanner is in prison, being accused of assassination. It will go very hard with him; the minds of the people are very much exasperated against him. Father (Anthony?) Lienhart, who was so much thought of, is a confirmed drunkard. On this topic Brands has received no favorable account regarding Mr. Roesh because he left home without being able to pay his wine merchant. In great need as they stand of clergymen here, Brands would not wish that he or Father Ogé should come to Texas before the Bishop's return. Brands knows the latter; he has had enough to fight with scandals. Father (A.H.) Gandolfo, (C. M.) wrote that he had left, at his return from Genoa, a chasuble for their mission with Father (Angelo) Mascaroni. Brands has written to send it to him but has received no answer. The best opportunity to send it, is by the steamer McKim now at New Orleans. Captain Philips is a Catholic and a perfect gentleman as are his mate and clerk. Brands asks (Blanc) to tell him to send it on board. Brands is very anxious to have that present, made by the best of his friends. (Odin) complains that he has never received a letter from Brands. He has written every; two weeks; Father Rousselon can testify to this as he was directed to send every letter to Rousselon to be sent to Paris. Among them are letters of great importance.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 4to. - {11}
1855 Aug. 6
McCaffrey, Father John:
Mt. St. Mary's (Emmittsburg, Maryland)
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
He sent O'Donuoghue and Barry according to Purcell's directions. He is unexpectedly deserted by two of his best teachers. He is at a loss for competent teachers. He begs Purcell to give him a teacher if he can. Mr. Walker has been very efficient. They have no seminarians able to render such service. They had Bishop (George) Carrell (S.J.) at their last commencement. Next year they want a grand reunion. He asks Purcell, his brother, Fathers Collins, Quinlan, Gileman etc. to be there. They will have room enough.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 8vo. - {2}
1855 Aug. 6
Mina, Father Ve. M(odest)e:
St. John Baptist, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop Ant(hony) Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
Ovide Vinchneair, in whom Mina was so interested, has just married before the justice of the peace, Emile Rigaud. Since then he avoids Mina. Mina has not seen Valsin Clement, his cousin, again, since his civil marriage.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 1p. - 12mo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 7
Blenkinsop, Father W(illiam) A.:
Chicopee, Mass(achusetts)
to Archbishop A(nthony) Blanc:
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
Mrs. (James) Greely, whose husband, James Greely died lately, has been informed that Blanc was making inquiries about her place of residence, as he had some money that belonged to her husband. She asks Blanc to let her know if this is true.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 1p. - 12mo. - {3}
(18)55 Aug. 7
Gouesse, (C.S.C.), Father F(rancis):
New York, (New York)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Gouesse received (Blanc)'s letter of July 27 and thanks him for the certificate he sent. As for his excorporation he is still seeking it and as (Blanc) says he has not seen it and Bishop (Ignatius) Bourget of Montreal having said the same, Gouesse has concluded that if Bishop (Maurice de St. Palais) of Vincennes sent it to Father (Edward F.) Sorin, (C.S.C.) as he positively says he did, this document is at Le Lac. But then, how explain their silence? Gouesse has been very well received and is embarrassed by the choice of posts offered him. If Gouesse can be of any assistance to (Blanc) or any other person it will give him pleasure to learn of it.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {4}
1855 Aug. 7
Guesdon, (C.S.C.), Father I(sidore):
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
to Father (Stephen Rousselon:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
He thanks (Rousselon) for communicating the letter of Father (Francis) Gouesse, (C.S.C.) to him. Guesdon is disposed to send Gouesse all he asks for except the chalice which he paid for at Holy Cross but which was repaid by the Community on his return. The same Sisters whom Gouesse cited as evidence, were opposed to sending it from the time of Gouesse's first letter. Since this letter is addressed to the Archbishop and was not to be sent until after the Archbishop had read it, Guesdon has kept the secret of its content and will not use it until (Rousselon) permits him. Guesdon this morning, received a letter from France in which F(ather) Rector names a Salvatorian (Congregation of Holy Cross) whom he is ready to send Guesdon if he desires to have him. He is an Irishman who has studied theology in Rome for two years and who is to receive the subdiaconate at the next Ember Days. Guesdon would prefer that he send a Superior, to whom he could be the assistant, but this confrere would be very suitable.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {3}
1855 Aug. 7
Hecker, Father I(saac) T.:
N(ew) Y(ork), (New York)
to Orestes A. Brownson:
(Boston, Massachusetts)
Father Hecker speaks of an author who has written of certain men who can understand those outside the Catholic Church and yet understand the Church's own doctrine. This author has had only glimpses and the value of his articles lies in these glimpses. Hecker and Brownson have a double work: to raise Catholics to Catholic truth intellectually and morally, and to open the way for the American people to see the same truth in all its beauty. He was interested in the first and last articles of the last Number of the Review, and approves the conclusion of the last article which maintained that Catholics can not hope to convince the American people that they love their country unless they show genuine patriotic feeling for its interest and destiny.
I-3-l - A.L.S. (Part of Letter) - 3p. - 12mo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 7
Smith, (S.C), Sister Regina:
(Emmitsburg, Maryland)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Her long silence has not been her fault. She received (Blanc)'s letter and thanks him for visiting her own Sisters (of Charity). Before she left New Orleans, she had a hint of matters respecting the new house on Magazine Street. She therefore spoke to Sister Angelica, (S.C), about keeping Madame Emily and trying to make her comfortable. Since Regina came home she has received letters from her, Sister (Francis) Regis (Barrett, S.C.) and others. Regis was authorized to act with regard to the Sisters and Regina wrote to Angelica concerning Madame Emily begging that no one should be allowed to worry her or interfere with her duties. Angelica had acknowledged that Madame Emily's children were well disciplined and that she did not interfere with any of the Sisters to meet the many demands. No doubt (Blanc) has seen what their Sisters are doing in Norfolk and Portsmouth, Virginia. Regina does not know what Miss Bunkley thinks of this; she has sent many visitors as well as pupils. They had a "prise d'habit" of 16 and expect to have another of 12 or 14 on September 8. Mother Augustine, (S.C.) is a great deal better. Sister Mary Austin (Mudd, S.C.) is also improving fast and begins to think of her homeward travels. Mother (Mary) Xavier (Clark), (S.C.) is awaiting her final call; she is very weak. All their southerners are well except Sister Raphael, (S.C.) who has been to New York on business and has taken cold. Father (James F.) Burlando, (C.M.) is absent visiting establishments in the north. Father (A.H.) Gandolfo, (C.M.), is the same saintly missioner he ever was. Father M. O'Reilly is parish priest in Emmettsburg. Regina's charge is a heavy one but it was rendered much lighter by the kind and affectionate reception. Her beloved Sisters of Charity Hospital had spoiled her; she cannot get weaned as easily as she thought.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 4to. - {13}
1855 Aug. 8
Timon, John Bp. Buffalo:
Buffalo, New York
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
He thanks Purcell for his proof in deed of his truly Catholic spirit by giving up Father (William) Deiters. The clergyman which Father (Francis X.) Wenniger hopes to get for Purcell possesses excellent qualities. Timon hopes he will give Purcell full satisfaction.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 1p. - 8vo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 8
Brummer, Father J(ohn) W.:
Zanesville, Ohio
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
Father (William) Deiters gives Brummer the news that he is probably to go to Buffalo and that he has received a letter from Purcell stating that Brummer wished to stay in his missions provided Father (John Christion) Kraemer, Father(August Mary) Toebbe, and himself could live together. Now Brummer proposed this plan for the want of a better one. Father Kraemer thinks that it would not work well. Brummer begs the place of Father Deiters. He would then be near the good Dominican Fathers. Brummer's churches are now finished. He hopes Purcell will not refuse his petition after three years of toil. They will see about it when Purcell arrives. N.B. If he must remain here it can only be under the plan he proposed. He would like Purcell to bring Fathers (Bernard) Hengehold and (Henry) Juncker with him.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {9}
1855 Aug. 9
Grasty, Q.C.:
Pittsboro, Mississippi
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
(Chelsea, Massachusetts)
Brownson's review at this time is in the unusual posture of political affair. He writes to Brownson for the purpose of correcting misrepresentations and obtaining information. In his desire to defend the Catholic Church from any unjust accusations he is unwilling that misrepresentations of its doctrines should be so handles by demagogues in the present political contest as to lead popular protestant prejudices so far astray as to overthrow the Democratic party.
He is forwarding a written enclosed letter purported to have been written by Brownson and which is now floating through the newspaper world. He wants Brownson to admit its genuineness and correctness. Grasty is a Democrat and editor of the Calhoun Democrat.
l-3-L - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 8vo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 9
O'Regan Anthony, Bishop of:
Chicago, Illinois
to Bishop (Peter Paul Lefevere):
Detroit, (Michigan)
Father MacLoughlin, lately assistant in Trinity Church, Detroit, has applied to O'Regan for a mission. MacLoughlin says that all Lefevere has against him is that he left his diocese without permission. O'Regan asks if he can prudently give him a mission. O'Regan received a letter from Detroit from Father Angelvy making a charge against a priest which would oblige O'Regan to dismiss him forever if true. Last fall O'Regan refused Angelvy a mission. O'Regan asks Lefevere to write what he knows about Angelvy who says he is returning to his own diocese and was commanded by his confessor to make the disclosures to O'Regan and that Lefevere had refused him a mission because of statements against him by Father (Francis X.) de Maria, (S.J.). Hence he has had to support himself by giving French lessons.
III-2-i - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 9
Spalding, M(artin) J(ohn), Bishop of:
Louisville, (Kentucky)
to Bishop (Peter Paul) Lefevere:
Detroit, (Michigan)
Spalding must request that Lefevere invite someone else to give the retreat this year. They have had fearful riots in which their persons and churches have been in imminent danger. From fifty to one hundred have been "butchered," mostly Irish and Germans, and about 20 houses burned. One of the Jesuits of St. Louis or Cincinnati could no doubt do it if Lefevere would write to Father (William Stack) Murphy, Provincial at St. Louis.
III-2-i - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 8vo. - {2}
1855 Aug. 10
(Blanc), Ant(hony) Abp. New Orleans:
New Orleans, Louisiana
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
He thanks Purcell for his present of so valuable a laborer as Father (M.) Faure. Because of the Yellow fever in the city at present, Blanc does not want Faure to come as far as New Orleans as Yet. Three weeks ago they lost a young priest, Father (E.) Henriot. This morning they attended the funeral of one of their Jesuits, Father (Evglne) Plantas - a great loss. Blanc perfers that Faure stop at St. Michael's Church, 60 miles above New Orleans. The climate is very trying for new-comers. One of the sisters who attended the sick during '53 and '54 fell sick yesterday. He hopes God will spare her. Several of the younger sisters are in the Charity Hospital; so far only one has had the fever.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 12mo. - {5}
1855 Aug. 10
Guesdon, (C.S.C.), Father I(sidore):
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
The feat of the Assumption is fixed for First Communion for the children who are also prepared for Confirmation unless (Blanc) prefers the 19th. All is going perfectly at the Asylum now. Directors and directoresses rival one another in zeal. No one is ill.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {1}
1855 Aug. 10
(Martin), Bishop Aug(uste) M(ar)ie:
Natchitoches, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Yesterday (Martin) received a letter from Mr. Gillis, minor cleric of (Blanc)'s diocese, asking to be admitted to (Martin)'s. It seems he incurred (Blanc)'s displeasure by leaving Spring Hill without (Blanc)'s displeasure by leaving Spring Hill without (Blanc)'s authorization and worsened his position by leaving Father (Charles?) Chambost. Need as (Martin) has for subjects, he would not want to bring in unruly persons. (Martin) is telling Gillis today that he cannot admit him until (Blanc) has given a favorable account of him. Also that if he does admit him it will be only as a seminarian, continuing his studies. (Martin) will not admit him with a simple exeat. Nothing new here. The infernal work of the K(now) N(othings) is no longer a novelty. No sickness yet but September has not yet come.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {4}
1855 Aug. 11
Lynch, C.M., Father J(ohn):
Marseilles, (France)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Lynch sends this hurried note in reply to (Blanc)'s letter. He represented (Blanc)'s desires to their Superior General who desires as far as in his power to second (Blanc)'s views. He wishes that their confreres (Vincentians) should continue to direct the diocesan seminary. It should be in some healthy retired place where (Blanc) could quickly visit it. Lynch will be returning about a month from now to America and may have some French confrere to assist in their affairs. Without indigenous clergy, the Church must ever suffer. "Petits seminaires" in every diocese are of the first necessity. Their "petit" seminary of the Barrens which has already given about 30 members to the Congregation and about 100 theological students to the various dioceses of the United States, besides 8 to other religious orders, together with reports from China, Brazil, Persia, and throughout Asia, prove that American youth by early training can become excellent members of the priesthood. It is not in the colleges that youth will get a vocation but from parochial schools or homes. Lynch would like to see a "petit seminaire" in (Blanc)'s diocese. The creoles are easily inclined to virtues or to vice. Lynch hopes (Blanc) will excuse this hurried note written on his way to Rome on a pilgrimage to beg a blessing from their common father.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 4pp. - 12mo. - {3}
1855 Aug. 12
Chambost, Father Augustus:
Plaquemine, (Louisiana)
to Doctor Hall:
Bayou Goula, (Louisiana)
As Hall honored Chambost with performing the funeral of his late wife, Chambost takes the liberty of telling Hall that it is usual to have a service performed 40 days after death. As the Iberville chapel is in unfitting condition, Augustus's brother, (Father Charles Chambost), president of Plaquemine College offers his church and his own person to Hall's disposition. They have all that is necessary with three priests; the ornaments have just come from France. P.S. The funeral of Mrs. Hall and the expenses incurred, $110.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 2pp. - 4to. - {3}
1855 Aug. 12
Jan, Father A(nge) M(arie):
St. Martinville, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
By (Blanc)'s letter of the 9th, Confirmation at St. Martin is set for September 18 and at Pont-Breaux for the 20th. If it could have been at St. Martin on Sunday and Pont-Breaux on Thursday, it would have been more convenient but Jan will hold to what (Blanc) wrote. Mr. Dumartraitdied July 24 of a paralytic stroke. It is a real loss for the parish. Jan is still in the old presbytery; he freezes in winter and burns in the summer. Now that Dumartrait is gone, Jan thinks it will not be rebuilt for a long time. The trustees all know (Blanc)'s threat not to give Confirmation until a new presbytery was built. A resolution was taken almost a year ago but it seems to be set back to the Greek calendar. But they are actively pursuing the idea of making a walk in front of the church. All the materials are there.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 12mo - {3}
1855 August 13
McQuaid, B(ernard) J.:
Newark, N(ew) J(ersey)
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
(Boston, Massachusetts)
McQuaid invites Brownson to deliver a lecture before the young Mens Association of Newark on one of six suggested dates. He offers Brownson fifty dollars for the lecture and asks that if Brownson accepts the invitation, he notify him soon what date he will come and what his subject will be, P.S. He expects Dr. Monahan to give the introductory lecture on November 15.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 1p. - 16to. - {1}
1855 Aug. 14
(Byrne), Bishop Andrew:
Little Rock, (Arkansas)
to Archbishop (Anthony) Blanc:
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
Blanc has no doubt received The Annals for May containing the yearly distribution of alms to each diocese. (Byrne) is down as receiving 8196 francs when he has only received 2400. This mistake is very injurious. He has almost made up his mind to request the Society to omit his diocese and trust to friends east and south to support a poor Bishop who does not receive $100 in twelve months. Had he 2000 Catholics in his diocese embracing 55,000 square miles, he would not complain but when he finds religious houses in other dioceses receiving large sums and their ordinaries the same, he feels what he would not want to express. He has often made know his wants and the Sisters of Mercy have applied for aid but they have not received one cent. They had an exhibition in July at the convent. (Byrne) is finishing the convent of St. Anne at Fort Smith but he will have to go out of the diocese to secure the means to pay carpenters.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 8vo. - {4}
(18)55 Aug. 15
Beaugier, Father (A.):
Ville-Plate, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Since receiving (Blanc)'s letter, it had been impossible for him to go to Opelousas and he did not want to reply without telling the results of his interview with Father (Gilbert) Raymond. In reading (Blanc)'s letter to the pastor of Opelousas, September 6 was set for Confirmation at Ville-Plate while in (Blanc)'s letter to Beaugier it was set for the 5th. Today Beaugier realized that the 5th fell on Wednesday instead of Thursday of which (Blanc) spoke. As Beaugier believes that (Blanc)'s wish is to come to Ville-Plate on the 6th. (Blanc) will be welcomed in this poor parish as a father.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {3}
1855 Aug. 16
Collet, L(ouis):
Rennes, (France)
to Archbishop (Anthony) Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
Collet has received Blanc's letter of June 12 with the waiver of Théodore Leduc to the estate of Father (Julian) Priour for the money placed at Paris which was all he had in France. Mr. Huillard had turned over the money but it was necessary to fulfill all the legal formalities. This was very difficult because of the loss of the receipt given to Priour. Besides the judgment of livery of seisin, of which Collet sent Blanc a copy in his last letter, Collet had to obtain another judgment at Paris against Huillard to have the payment of the sum. He had to enlist the intervention of the Bishop of Rennes. Conforming to Blanc's letter of April 8, 1851, saying that he did not intend to turn to his profit, the universal legacy left him by Priour in his will, Collet has computed for each of Priour's brothers and sisters the amount designated in Priou's will. He has also distributed the Mass stipends, 900, as he wished to reserve 150 francs of the 1500 to reimburse Blanc for the sum Blanc sent by Bishop (Auguste) Martin. If Blanc does not wish to take back this money, Collet will have the 100 Masses said. As it is necessary to place the documents with a notary at Rennes, Collet encloses an act of release for Blanc to sign (no enclosure). Blanc is to have his signature legalized by the French consul at New Orleans. Blanc sends a statement of expenditures: (these include ) the fee of Mr. Beaufils, attorney at Rennes, payments to Jeanne Marie Priour Lavocat, Jeannette Priour Carré, Anne Priour Boutin, Guillaume Priour, the poor of the parishes of Betton, Aigné, and Chevaigné. P.S. A petition has been sent to the Minister of Finance to obtain payment of half the transfer duty. If they obtain it, they will get back 428 f(rancs) and from this sum Collet will have 100 Masses said if Blanc does not recover his expenses.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 3pp. - 4to. - {10}
1855 Aug. 16
Patterson, H(enr)y L.:
St. Louis, (Missouri)
to Archbishop (Anthony) Blanc:
New Orleans, L(ouisian)a
Blanc's favor of the 7th was received today. The necessity of entering into the matters referred to so that Blanc may be fully informed, will cause a delay of a few days. (Written on stationery of Lucas & Simonds, bankers.)
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 1p. - 4to. - {2}
1855 Aug. 17
Le Bray:
St. Louis, (Missouri)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Le Bray has just read in the newspaper about the epidemic in New Orleans. Le Bray owes (Blanc) much gratitude for his family whom (Blanc) underwrote before Le Bray's departure. Le Bray will have a Mass said in St. Louis Cathedral to ask God to protect (Blanc) from the epidemic.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 1p. - 8vo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 17
(Vandevelde), Bishop James Oliver:
Natchez, (Mississippi)
to Archbishop A(nthony) Blanc:
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
Blanc's letter of July 11, written 2 days after (Vandevelde)'s departure for St. Louis, reached here day before yesterday. (Vandevelde) wrote to Blanc a few days after his arrival at St. Louis after seeing Bishop (Peter Richard) Kenrick, Cha(rle)s Hunt and (Henry L.) Patterson. Kenrick's letters confirm what (Vandevelde) had written; (Vandevelde) acted only after Kenrick's counsel and the intentions of Mrs. (Anne Lucas) Hunt. He does not believe that after the first act of donation as Bishop of Chicago is invalid except as regards his successor which the laws of Missouri do not recognize. If he had not given the property back to Mrs. Hunt, it should remain to him, his heirs, and assigns, as Blanc thinks himself. If the first act was invalid, his act of surrender to Mrs. Hunt would be also and the deed of the lot which she gave him last year would be valid, as well as the one for the two lots she gave to Bishop (Anthony) O'Regan this year. The intermediary deed of Mrs. Hunt to her son and son-in-law "in trust for the future Bishop of Quincy" would count for nothing since it was never recorded and Hunt and Patterson returned the trust to the donor. Mrs. Hunt did not offer the two lots; O'Regan asked for them and obtained them as Administrator of Quincy. Patterson drew up the deed in fee simple for the two lots destined for Quincy. Patterson did all he could to persuade Mrs. Hunt to force (Vandevelde) to give up what she had given him. Then O'Regan — "he is a pugnacious little Bishop," said Patterson — "who seems to hanker after money" — got into a rage and reproached her for robbing Chicago. He was happy to have the deed of the two lots; a few days later he announced the sale of his two lots in the St. Louis newspapers. Up to now, according to J. Byrue, no one has bought them. O'Regan appealed to Rome and without waiting for a decision, he seizes it and disposes of the contested property. (Vandevelde) arrived in Chicago July 24; O'Regan invited him to dinner the next day, the anniversary of his consecration and (Vandevelde)'s patronal feast day. All went in a friendly way until (Vandevelde)'s departure when O'Regan tried to induce him to give him the third lot. (Vandevelde) said he would do so if Blanc, as arbiter named by the authorities in Rome, decided he should. O'Regan became enraged and declared he would submit neither to Blanc nor to Rome. (Vandevelde) told O'Regan that he had upset everything since his appointment to Chicago while (Vandevelde) had remained passive and ready to submit to the decision of his superiors. O'Regan left the next day for Cairo. (Vadevelde) regrets having proposed him as his successor for Chicago; he seemed humble, pious and disinterested. They say he has completely changed character since becoming bishop. He has quarreled with the Archbishop of St. Louis and with the best priests of his dicese. He is "unpopular with all priests." The decision should not be made by lawyers but by an ecclesiastical court. O'Regan saw several bishops at Pittsburg and gave his views about Mrs. Hunt's donation. As for the priest from Martinique, Father (Mathurin F.) Grignon says that he wrote to Blanc. Quarantine has been put on here at Vicksburg. (Vandevelde) has only French priests, Father (Richard B.) Hardey having left, in the whole part of his diocese. Perhaps the place that would suit him best would be Pass Christian. Blanc could write to Father (Peter) Holton about it.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 3pp. - 4to. - {12}
1855 Aug. 18
Fransoni, Cardinal J(ames) Ph(ilip):
Rome, Italy
to Archbishop Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
From Fransoni's latest letter, Blanc will see judgment was given to Blanc concerning the controversy between the bishops of Chicago and Natchez. Blanc can grasp an accurate idea of it from the documents from Rome. Those things Blanc added in his letter of July 2 in favor of Bishop (James Oliver) Vandevelde can be brought forth to prove that he acted in good faith since the gift had been made to him as bishop of Chicago and to his successors. No reason can be seen why the church of Chicago should be deprived of a third of its bequest for the good of Natchez. It is otherwise with Quincy for when the gift was made to Chicago and they were then divided, the goods seemed to be divided evenly between them. Al(exander) Barnabò signs as secretary.
VI-1-i - L.S. - (Latin) - 1p. - 4to. - {5}
1855 Aug. 19
Huntington, J(edediah) V(incent) St. Louis, (Missouri):
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
Huntington, confined to bed, answers Brownson's letter complaining of personal hostility in The Leader so that he may disavow it. He has always expressed his admiration of the Review and of Brownson as a writer but criticized where he differed in opinion. His chief supporters are, although good Catholics, of the clan who are afraid of the school of converts who are not content to go on in the old ways of their fathers. He has defended in The Leader the same view of the relations of the spiritual and temporal that Brownson has exposed in The Review. As long as his supporters did not consider him as a "blind follower of Brownson" they tended to assent with him. While Huntington criticized Brownson as a Lenton or Bakewell never would do, they were satisfied that he should praise Brownson. The Shepherd of the Valley is regarded with horror by most Catholics of St. Louis. Huntington has not forgotten Brownson's disparagement of "Alban" and that "Pretty Plate" which even MacMaster pronounced the best children's story he ever read got no notice in The Review. The only thing he complained of in the reply to J.V.H.'s letter was that Brownson misinterpreted his introductory observation. The point in which they differ most is nativism and yet he is conscious of strong sympathies with almost everything Brownson says. He is a Nativist in sentiment - he dislikes foreigners and is proud of his New England descent. Catholicity is more to him than his call hence he goes for Catholic foreigners and their political influence. In his notice in the Metropolitan he he was forced to strike out many things favorable to Brownson. Mr. Murphy insisted that he do so. Huntington thinks Brownson is too hard on (John Gilmary) Shea. Though not a correct writer Shea is a dangerous foe and Huntington would advise converting him into a friend. Huntington was not aware that Brownson's sons had refused The Leader or that it had been offered to them. As for Brownson's proposition of friendship and cooperation in the future Huntington accepts it with all his heart. The times require that the friends of truth act in concert. P.S. He is gratified by Brownson's good opinion of The Leader and he sympathises with Brownson's bad health.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 14pp. - 8vo. - {4}
1855 Aug. 20
Guesdon, (C.S.C.), Father I(sidore):
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
(Blanc) having forgotten his pontifical in the sacristy yesterday, Guesdon takes the occasion to renew his thanks for a ceremony which made the children so happy. For a long time Guesdon has wanted to communicate to Blanc) the two letters recently sent by the Rector (Father Basil Anthony Moreau, C.S.C.?). Guesdon had thought of informing Brothers Ignace, (C.S.C.) and Elie, (C.S.C.) of the the Rector's intention to send another priest. As they knew that Guesdon had asked for a Superior and not an assistant, they fear a renewal of the troubles of the past. These poor people have suffered so much and are now so happy in the harmony which has reigned for some time. But knowing how much he is below his position, he has from the first wished to be under obedience to another. He believes he has enough influence on the Community to dispose them to receive this Superior. He has written to the Rector asking him to send someone quickly for he fears they will write to stop a change of Superior. If (Blanc) writes to Holy Cross, he is to tell the Rector of his sincere wish.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French)) - 3pp. - folio - {4}
1855 Aug. 20
Lyons, Father M.P.:
Iberville, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
(Blanc) will be interested to know how the law affair is being conducted. A day or two after Father (Ennemond) Dupuy's arrival Lyons went to the justice of the peace to make an affidavit that on July 25, Robert Toussin broke down the fence. A copy was sent to Father (Charles?) Chambost to Plaquemine. Lyons went there a few days after to ask La Bauve what was best to do in case it would be tried first before the justice of the peace. La Bauve had gone to Biloxi; Chambost has a copy of the affidavit and will present it to La Bauve. Yesterday Lyons let drop some expressions of how unpopular the matter was at Plaquemine, how the feeling was in favor of Robert and in condemnation of Dupuy for having recourse to such a base trick and that Chambost thought the same. Dupuy felt displeased. Recorder Rousseau happened to be at dinner, he said Dupuy was greatly to be blamed for digging a hole to entrap or injure any person, that the general feeling was that it was considered a public pass, and that in 1818 a jury of police ordered it for that purpose. Lyons quoted Law that "every man is Lord and Master of his own premises" but it was no use. Rousseau may be a recorder but Lyons thinks he is an alien to legal knowledge. Lyons was also informed that he was sent here to be a tool in the hands of Dupuy to bring the affair to a calm conclusion so that the odium would be off Dupuy's shoulders whilst weighing heavily on Lyons and that when the case commenced on the 4th Monday of October, Lyons would be sent adrift. This story stung Lyons to the quick. Lyons is a young priest; he does not want his character degraded. Dupuy enjoys favorable health. Lyons would like to be withdrawn and sent where he will be permanent. Lyons has not made a retreat since ordination; if (Blanc) advises, he will go to Springhill for a week or 10 days. P.S. The domestic, Josephine, is to tie up some linen Lyons forgot and send it if anyone comes this side.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 4pp. - 4to. - {6}
1855 Aug. 20
Patterson, Henry L.:
St. Louis, (Missouri)
to Archbishop (Anthony) Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
Patterson on the 16th acknowledged the receipt of Blanc's letter of the 7th. He regrets that the controversy should have been so far persisted in as to require the appointment of an umpire and that Patterson must appear as the principal and perhaps the only witness. Patterson's knowledge of the motives inducing the gratuity may enable Blanc to arrive at a righteous decision. Shortly after Father (James Oliver) Van DeVelde was made Bishop, he had been to Chicago and had seen some discouraging things. He wrote to Patterson's mother-in-law on the subject, followed up those appeals by personal applications when in this city. The donations followed and Patterson asserts that while the property was conveyed to him officially, she desired to do him a personal kindness. The deed of April 8, 1855, first of the series, from which Blanc quotes, has same official indication of entail beginning "and to his successors." Blanc desires to know whether the whole of this quoted part was inserted at the request of the donor as restrictive or at the request of V(an) de V(elde) himself. Patterson answers in the negative for the first and is not aware that V(andevelde) made any suggestions whatever. Blanc also asks whether V(andevelde) having ceased to be Bishop of Chicago, could dispose of the donation in his new diocese. Patterson has stated that the donation was made for something besides obliging Vandevelde personally by aiding him in promoting the cause of religion; the personal wants of a friend of 30 years entered largely into the motives of the donor. In regard to the Quincy portion, the original deeds make no mention of it at all. It was Mrs. (Anna) Hunt's wish and V(andevelde)'s intention to do something there with a part of the property. Bishop Anthony O'Regan obtained from Mrs. Hunt on March 29, 1855 a deed for two of the three pieces of property. This deed vests in O'Regan, Bishop of Chicago, "his heirs and assigns" the two pieces without restrictions. Mrs. Hunt left to him as formerly to V(andevelde) the rightful application. Patterson asserts that O'Regan violates the proprieties of good faith by pushing this controversy to the extremity it has reached. Mrs. Hunt is mortified extremely and almost regrets her attempted kindness.
- A.L.S. - 4pp.
In the matter of Anne Lucas Hunt, Grantor; James O. VanDevelde, Anthony O'Regan, Grantees. Deeds, their order, etc.: No. 1 deed, April 8, 1851, 1851, the preamble. No. 2 deed, April 16, 1851, phraseology same as No. 1. No. 3 deed, November 15, 1853, conveying back the three pieces mentioned in Nos. 1 and 2. No. 4 deed, November 15, 1853, Patterson and Ch(arle)s Hunt, trustees. No. 5 deed, July 6, 1854. No. 6 deed, March 29, 1855 conveys to O'Regan two pieces of property before mentioned.
- D. - 3pp.
VI-1-i - A.L.S., D. - 7pp. - 4to. & folio - {7}
1855 Aug. 20
Raymond, Father G(ilbert):
Opelousas, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Raymond has just received (Blanc)'s letter of the 13th; he thanks (Blanc) for the solution of the different cases. Raymond told Dr. (Joseph A.) Botti what (Blanc) thought. Raymond is going to write to father (Charles) Chambost. Botti came to St. Martin but not to Opelousas. Raymond also met the brother of that woman about whom Raymond spoke to (Blanc) in regard to Mr. R. He will not go back to see him but he will write to him. Raymond told their men of (Blanc)'s decision about their ordination and examination. Rene Pineau received the call with pleasure; H. Picherit was frightened at first by the idea of going into the diaconate so promptly. If an archiepiscopal Mass could be celebrated it would be good for the parish where the Episcopalians have sent a minister. All the necessary officiators would be found here, there being four ecclesiastics counting the two young men. Unfortunately the organ they are expecting from Cincinnati will no be here for (Blanc)'s visit. Solomon Gaubert and Mélasie Gaubert wish to marry and need a dispensation. Their fathers are half brothers, the man's father and the girl's grandfather are also half brothers. They want to be married two weeks from today. They do not have breviaries for the two men. Amid the losses sustained by the diocese, Raymond feels happy to be able to present two good subjects for ordination.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 4pp. - 4to. - {7}
(18)55 Aug. 23
B., Mary:
N(ew) O(rleans, Louisiana)
to (Archbishop Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Mary's husband has just left a crushing disappointment on her heart. She has cast her whole existence upon one act over which he cannot nor shall not step. She is sure he appreciates (Blanc)'s good will in their behalf. She is not angry with him for not accepting (Blanc)'s name; he has been very kind in explaining it to her. She will have wealth but where are the lady-like privileges she needs. She got that paper from her husband which she showed (Blanc) with her promise that she would see him through his last difficulty. She wants means in her own hands. She will come to see (Blanc) tomorrow.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 4pp. - 4to. - {1}
1855 Aug. 23
O(restes) A. Brownson:
Boston, Massachusetts)
to Je(dediah) V. Huntington:
(St. Louis, Missouri)
Brownson wrote Huntington a long private letter and then he received a copy of the Leader containing some remarks on one of his letters which he considered favorable. Yesterday, however, he received a later copy, which contains a criticism based upon a misconception of his views as expressed in the letter referred to. As Huntington admitted he had not seen the letter referred to. Brownson submits a copy to be published in the "Leader". The letter he says is entirely consistent with the doctrines on the temporal power of the Pope maintained in the Review. Brownson maintains the sole right to interpret his views and does not understand whether Huntington regards him as too Callican or too ultra montane. Brownson maintains that the authority of the Pope is necessary to decide when a Prince has violated his position and forfeited his spiritual power and that the people cannot decide for themselves further while the Pope can absolve in matters spiritual the subject is still subject to the tyrant in civil matters, This he points out distinguishes his doctrine from that of the Revolutionists. The obligation of Catholics to an unbelieving prince are the same as to a Catholic prince. Brownson thinks Huntington has been too hasty in his judgements.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 8pp (There are also 9 pages of rough drafts of parts of this letter). - 12mo. - {3}
1855 Aug. 24
Gouesse, (C.S.C.), Father F(rancis):
Detroit, (Michigan)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Will (Blanc) read the enclosed letter and send it on to its address. Gouesse wishes to finish with this Congregation (of Holy Cross) with dignity and honor. (P.S.) Four prelates of the United States are arguing about Gouesse's services and on the advice of Archbishop (John Joseph) Hughes, Gouesse came here. He will write later.
- A.L.S. - (French) -
1855 Aug. 24
Gouesse, (C.S.C.), Father F(rancis):
(Detroit, Michigan)
to Father (Isidore) Guesdon, (C.S.C.):
(New Orleans, Louisiana)
Gouesse will not claim anything which does not belong to him. The rules accord to those who withdraw from the Community, with the consent of the Superior General, an outfit of clothing and even a sum of money if they have rendered service to the Community. As this is his case, and since he has received neither clothing or money as Guesdon knows according to what he wrote about it to Canada, the rules and Gouesse's affirmation were more than sufficient. Luckily Gouesse was doubtful, having asked Father (Joseph) Rézé (C.S.C.) for the enclosed piece (no enclosure) under the date of July 30 and which Guesdon asked Gouesse for. On August 11, he asked for his outfit of clothing from Holy Cross who instead of sending it, gave him an authorization to have it. About the chalice, he believes Guesdon is mistaken. Father (Basil Anthony) Moreau, (C.S.C.) did not give it to Gouesse. He permitted him to buy it with money given ad hoc and which would certainly never be put into the Community. Gouesse has suffered enough from and in the Community to ask Guesdon to put an end to all painful memories by granting or refusing what he asks for. If Gouesse could, like Guesdon, send to the north and to the west those who do not harmonize with him, and to replace them with others, no doubt Gouesse would have been very happy too. All the Sisters can tell Guesdon what belongs to Gouesse, in particular, Sister Mary of the Passion, (C.S.C.) and Sister (Mary) of Calvary, (C.S.C.). His theology and scapulars are to be given to Sister Mary of the Passion. (P.S.) All is to be addressed to Father A(nnet) Lafont, New York without any mention of Gouesse's name. If Guesdon writes soon, he is to address Gouesse at the bishop's house in Detroit. He sends respects to Guesdon's archbishop.
- A.L.S. -
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 4pp. - 8vo. 12mo. - {9}
(18)55 Aug. 25
B., M(ary):
N(ew) O(rleans, Louisiana)
to (Archbishop Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Since she has had the time to reflect she is convinced that (Blanc) is right. (Blanc) told her that it is too late to begin now after so long neglecting her duties. It shows that she is a doomed wretch. She does not think she has the courage to ask anything from a Protestant. Last Saturday (Blanc) told her that she depended too much on human aid and not enough on God. She has prayed for two years that God would open the way for her to make amends for the past. She has hoped something would remove the restrictions under which she has lived for 18 years. She has had no friend but (Blanc) and he is too poor. She will never feel the same toward her husband for this weakness and pretended delicacy in this matter. (Blanc) thinks when men are polite and affable they can be managed. It is not always the case and even (Blanc) can be mistaken in persons. She is still under the influence of hope in Christ which has brought her and her child through so many years of privation. This far her child is safe but M(ary) is lost. She remains grateful till death.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - 4pp. - 4to. - {1}
1855 Aug. 25
Brownson, O(restes) A.:
Boston, (Massachusetts)
to J(edediah) V. Huntington:
St Louis, (Missouri)
Brownson thanks Huntington for the letter but regrets to find him unwell. Huntington's reason for occasionally attaching him is frankly stated. Brownson can understand it, but it would not serve his purpose. He could die for the truth but not deny it or attack a friend for defending it, however fierce may be the popular cry against him. Brownson has been most grossly misunderstood, misrepresented and abused when he had to right to expect better things. Huntington has always had a social position; Brownson never had one and consequently is less able to bear the loss of public character. Huntington is more Nativist than Brownson, for Brownson is not proud of his Puritan ancestors and he has no hostile feelings towards foreigners. He is strongly attached to the Irish. What Huntington wants, Brownson also wants and is laboring for with all his might. But any movement at present is premature. He regrets to learn from Huntington's letter that no notice was taken of "The Pretty Plate." He wrote a very favorable notice which he supposed had been inserted. It must have been crowded out and then forgotten. The same thing occurred with a book of (John Gilmary) Shea. Brownson is willing to be Shea's friend, but Shea will never be his. J.V.H. in "The Truth Teller," he knew, spoke ironically. He supposed his only object was to do Brownson what injury he could, and supposed himself perfectly justified in doing what he did to defeat his purpose. Bishop (Michael) O'Connor in "The Metropolitan" misrepresented him. Archbishop (Francis Patrick Kenrick) of Baltimore and Archbishop (Peter Richard Kenrick) of St. Louis assured him personally that they agree with him. Archbishop (John Hughes) of New York, he is told, approved of his articles. They were approved by Archbishop (Peter Flavian Turgeon) of Quebec and Bishop (John B. Fitzpatrick) of Boston, by Mr. Edward Purcell of Cincinnati. Archbishop (John B.) Purcell of Cincinnati assured him before they were written that he could (not) go too far in asserting the papal power for him, and some five or six other bishops have expressed their agreement with Brownson. The only editors that ventured to treat him with justice were (R.A.) Bakewell and the late W(illia)m Linton, and they were abused. Time and health will not permit him to write the article Huntington refers to, but he has written an article on the Know-Nothing Platform for his next Review. During this year he has published his articles without submitting them to any censor, and he is persuing a policy of his own. (There are two drafts of this letter.)
I-3-l - A. Drafts S. - 24pp. - 12mo. - {16}
1855 Aug. 26
Floarnoy, John James:
New Athens, G(eorgi)a
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
(Boston, Massachusetts)
Floarnoy inquires if Brownson is a clergyman. He wonders if Brownson would print and comment upon his views on man's religious and political duties and the extent and authority of a hierarchy to control them. He is a Protestant but remains neutral in the controversy between the K(now-)N(othings) and the group known as the Anti's - accrediting the spirit of Americanism only against the Irish; but not attaching to northern Europeans generally. He wishes information on Catholicity.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 1p. - folio - {4}
1855 Aug. 27
(Blanc), Ant(hony) Abp. New Orleans:
New Orleans, Louisiana
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
Father M. Faure was half dead with exhaustion when he reached New Orleans. He was on board six days without sleep or food. Father (Stephen) Rousselon received and attended him. Father (J.) Adams (S.J.) died at Baton Rouge from the yellow fever. Blanc does not know as yet what he will do with Faure. Faure would like a place where he would be along, but Blanc has no such place at present. Faure is old to be an assistant to one of the Cures. He says he was a member of a Religious Con gregation in Bordeaux, that he has been authorized to leave the society; but Blanc sees no proof of it as he has no papers. Blanc thanks Purcell for sending Faure to him, but he does not want any more priests who do not speak English. Blanc will be away from the city for six weeks on a visitation. The Know-Nothing Tree has given out its genuine fruit in Louisville. Mme. Santa Anna is in New Orleans since Saturday. Santa Anna is in Havana, so they say. He owns an immense plantation with 300 slaves in Louisiana, and a number of beautiful rent houses in New Orleans.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {10}
1855 Aug. 27
Dicharry, Father F(elix):
Natchitoches, (Louisiana)
to Father E(tienne) Rousselon:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
Bishop (Auguste) Margin having given Dicharry charge of the studies of their young seminarians, he asks Rousselon to send them what is necessary for English, French, Latin, and Spanish. They have no Spanish catechisms at all; Rousselon is to send about 20. From now on, Dicharry will often have need of Rousselon's kindness. After long reflexion, Martin has decided to let Dicharry join in the administration of the diocese by appointing him vicargeneral on August 24th. Martin sends regards to Father Figari.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 12mo. - {2}
1855 Aug. 27
Le Bray:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Le Bray is back from St. Louis unexpectedly. He had a place in a firm for 6 weeks but he received no money. He demanded it and he lost half his work(? the paper is stained and it is impossible to read the writing on these lines). Le Bray arrived 4 days ago; he is without money and obliged to leave his trunk as a guarantee for $10 which he owed. He has done nothing but look for work since he arrived. This morning at the recommendation of a doctor, Le Bray found a good firm to work for as a carpenter; he needs only $3; he has only 25 cents. He sent his family the amount of his subscription; he expects it in November. He sent (Blanc) a letter from St. Louis a few days before he left telling that he was having a Mass said in the St. Louis Cathedral for the persons who helped him with their subscriptions to protect them from the epidemic.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 1p. - 12mo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 27
Lachapelle, Ch. Ferrand:
St. Michael, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Father (Claude Anthony) Tholomier has had an organist come who knows plain chant and singing. Although the parishioners and Tholomier's predecessors have always seemed satisfied with his services, Lachapelle understands that he is to retire. The purpose of this letter is to assure (Blanc) that in spite of events, he will always feel it a pleasure to serve the Church in every way possible, as he has in the past.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 2pp. - 4to. - {2}
1855 Aug. 27
Lombard, Father Ed.:
Stigny, (France)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
Lombard has not forgotten the welcome (Blanc) gave him at his arrival in New Orleans and the hospitality during his stay from October (18)51 to March 1852. He planned, during (Blanc)'s stay in France, on (Blanc)'s return from France, to have an interview with him in which he would renew his thanks and tell (Blanc) of the reasons for his return to France in 1852 and his plan to return to (Blanc)'s diocese, if Father (J.M. Morisot?) Morysot(?) of (Blanc)'s diocese whom Lombard met at the Foreign Missions last February had told him sooner of (Blanc)'s impending departure for New Orleans. The posts which (Blanc) offered him did not suit Lombard, or rather he would not suit them. Although he is still young he would have to change his habits; especially he would have to travel on horseback which he does not do. Two days before leaving, Father (Arthur William) Duquesnay, pastor of St. Augustine's, told Lombard that he regretted to see him leave, that he had always hoped to get him as an assistant, Father (J.M) Lefranc having to quit these functions in the following July as St. Ann's church was to be finished by that time. It was too late then to change, Lombard's passage was paid. But he feels an attraction for New Orleans; he feels he could do more good there than in France. If (Blanc) thinks Lombard could become an assistant or pastor in his episcopal city, Lombard will always remember him with veneration. P.S. He sends his respects to Father Rousselon.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 4pp. - 4to. - {4}
1855 Aug. 28
Ives, L(evi) S(illiman):
(New York, New York)
to O(restes) A. Brownson:
Boston, Massachusetts
He tells Brownson that he has not received an answer from him on his article. He wished he could have seen Brownson himself, but his wife's sickness prevented the meeting. They will give him some good news about converts in due time.
I-3-l - A.L.S. - 1p. - 8vo. - {1}
1855 Aug. 29
Brownson, O(restes) A.:
Boston, (Massachusetts)
to (Father) I(saac) T. Hecker:
New York, New York
Brownson believes it would be better for him and his Review to live in New York. There is only one reason against doing it, the expense of moving and getting established in a new home. He thinks he could exert far more personal influence in New York than in Boston. He could leave all, except the Bishop (John Fitzpatrick) without much regret. Brownson thinks he could get alone with the Archbishop (John Hughes) without any serious difficulty; and also, he could breast the storm still raging against him in New York under (Hughes') patronage. Brownson shall be grateful to Hecker and to his friends in New York who prepare the way. He is glad to hear of the move Hecker has been making. The bringing together of men of similar views with regard to the action desirable upon new Catholic countrymen is very important. Brownson is sorry not to have Dr. (Levi S) Ives' article in season for his next number. Brownson believes the October number will please Hecker. The first article is on "The Temporal power of the Pope". The article is designed to show that if the American people are to be converted to Catholicity, it will be understood to be under the ultramontane form. Brownson thinks (James) McMaster's will like all the articles. Brownson has taken a preliminary step to a reconciliation between Dr. (Jedediah V.) Huntington and himself. The Bishop (John Fitzpatrick) is as warm a friend as ever. The Bishop is the only one who sympathizes with Brownson. Brownson hopes Hecker gets along well with his new book.
I-4-g - A.L.S. (Photostat, Paulist Archives) - 4pp. - 12mo. - {5}
1855 Aug. 30
Nesmith, Mary (D.):
Bellows Falls, (Vermont)
to Bishop (James Roosevelt) Bayley:
Newark, (New Jersey)
They have just arrived at Bellows Falls. Their first day there was at Centre Harbour, Bayley's birthday. They had a very pleasant time in Derry among the Nesmith clan, and she was a good little relative. They left the lake yesterday morning and crossed the country over to the Connecticut River. She never felt better and Mr. Nesmith enjoys more than his usual health. They will remain here two days, then stop at Deerfield, Springfield for Sunday and Monday to Middletown, proposing to get home on September 5. They hope to find Bayley at Newark. Nesmith received a note from Julia (Beers). Frank (Nesmith) sends best love to his godfather and asks to be remembered in his prayers on morning of the sixth, Frank's birthday.
II-2-n - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 12mo. - {2}
1855 Aug. 30
Whelan, O. P., Father James St. Jos. P.:
Zanesville, Ohio
to Archbishop John Baptist Purcell:
of Cincinnati, Ohio
They have completed a brick school house on the lots opposite St. Thomas ' Church. There will be but a small debt which Father (Charles) Montgomery will shortly be able to liquidate. There are from 250 to 200 children who ought to attend the school daily. Whelan asks permission to bring 2 or 4 Dominican Sisters from Somerset to attend the female schole. He also asks permission to make an attempt to replace the old church at Somerset with a new one. Whelan will take up the matter with the congregation and make arrangements so as to prevent pecuniary embarrassment afterwards. He will not attempt to build on credit. Their College exercises will commence on next Monday. He has done all in his power to enable it to go on prosperously. P.S. He encloses an account of the dedication of St. Rose's (Kentucky) to be inserted in the Telegraph. He is just on his way to Washington City. He will be pleased learn Purcell's will about the sisters and the church either in Washington or after his return which will be in about 4 weeks.
II-4-m - A.L.S. - 3pp. - 8vo. - {7}
1855 Aug. 31
Dicharry, Father F(elix):
Natchitoches, (Louisiana)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
If he did not know (Blanc)'s goodness, Dicharry would not dare to write after neglecting so long to do so. He has only good news to tell. His health grows better every day; he is happy to follow the path providence has chosen for him. He does not know if he should hold a grudge against (Blanc) for encouraging Bishop (Auguste) Martin; he will try to justify the choice.
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (French) - 1p. - 12mo. - {2}
1855 Aug. 31
Tancer, Father John:
Easton, (Pennsylvania)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, Louisiana)
On the occasion of the visitation of Bishop John (Nepomucene) Neuman(n), the need for the building of a church here was raised; but they have no funds. Tancer asks for help.
- A.L.S. - (Latin) -
1855 Aug. 29
Schmid, Barthelemo(?):
Allentown, (Pennsylvania)
to Archbishop (Anthony Blanc:
New Orleans, (Louisiana)
He addresses Blanc in the name of a great number of Swiss and Fribourg German, French and Irish Catholics of Allentown. They are deprived of a church and even a corner to bury their dead. They They have a common desire to build a church but they are powerless if some one does not come to their aid with financial means. They hope that Blanc will aid them. The nearest church is 20 miles away. Most of their brothers are already grown cold because of this privation; what will become of their children. If Blanc favors them with some gifts he is to send them to the pastor of Iston. If their means had permitted, they would have sent a man to collect.
- A.L.S. - (French) -
VI-1-i - A.L.S. - (Latin & French) - 2pp. - folio - {5}