pg 386 The writer of this memoir does not wish to derogate in the least from the profound respect due to the Bishop of Chicago. He thinks that he sees things just as he has set them down. He believes himself to be quite sure that vexation at the non-payment of the rent was merely the occasion for the Bishop to carry out a preconceived plan, namely, that of resuming possession of the college as soon as possible, this desire having only increased after the removal of the cathedral, which is now separated from the college by only a single street, but he seems to have consulted his own views only with reference to a temporary advantage of the diocese, without regard to the rights there acquired by the Congregation. This opinion, (which is nothing more [than an opinion] however,) is supported by the positive and repeated declarations of His Lordship that "if he found subterfuge in the contract, he would unhesitatingly use it," and that "Bishop O'Regan had no right to make this contract and that therefore it was null." Hence it would follow, if this way of action was lawful: 1. That little faith could be placed in the word and the promises of